LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2021, 09:23 AM   #1
mjolnir
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 771

Rep: Reputation: 87
NASA extracts breathable oxygen from Martian air


"NASA has logged another extraterrestrial first on its latest mission to Mars: converting carbon dioxide from the Martian atmosphere into pure, breathable oxygen, the U.S. space agency said on Wednesday. ...In its first activation, the toaster-sized instrument dubbed MOXIE, short for Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment, produced about 5 grams of oxygen, equivalent to roughly 10 minutes' worth of breathing for an astronaut, NASA said." https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sc...ir-2021-04-22/
 
Old 04-22-2021, 09:42 AM   #2
floppy_stuttgart
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: EU mainland
Distribution: Debian like
Posts: 901
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 86
Go to the internet..
a) buy few cartridges
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebreather
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039778/
b) buy an open sources computer
c) go under the water
.. you will feel like on Mars?
 
Old 04-22-2021, 10:03 AM   #3
mjolnir
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 771

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 87
I believe they are using a process similar to this one to break the CO2 molecules which make up 95% (approx.) of the thin Martian atmosphere into CO and O2: https://pubs.rsc.org/-/content/artic...h#!divAbstract
 
Old 04-26-2021, 05:48 AM   #4
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, RPi OS, Mint & Android
Posts: 12,671

Rep: Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612Reputation: 1612
I admire the engineering achievement. Personally, I find this research rather pointless. It's fuelling scientific dreams, not advancing knowledge. Earth has
  • An Oxygen cycle
  • A Nitrogen cycle
  • A Carbon Dioxide cycle
  • Several Soil Regeneration cycles. All the nourishment taken out of soil is replaced in various ways.

All are necessary to sustain civilization. Growing civilizations, as a general rule, aren't very technically savvy. There's a little oxygen there - so?
 
Old 04-26-2021, 07:00 AM   #5
igadoter
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: wroclaw, poland
Distribution: many, primary Slackware
Posts: 2,157
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
They can convert CO2 on Mars into oxygene but can't do the same on Earth? We are closing coal-fired power stations because of CO2 they emit. It is said all this climate change is because of CO2. So if NASA can do this on Mars let do the same here - and forget climate change meetings.
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:14 PM   #6
mjolnir
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 771

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
They can convert CO2 on Mars into oxygene but can't do the same on Earth? We are closing coal-fired power stations because of CO2 they emit. It is said all this climate change is because of CO2. So if NASA can do this on Mars let do the same here - and forget climate change meetings.
Of course they can do the same on Earth. It's just not conducive to lessening 'climate change' by using an energy intensive process to try to remove CO2 even if one believes that such a procedure is a necessity, of which I am, at this point, agnostic.
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:04 PM   #7
Ser Olmy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,976

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
They can convert CO2 on Mars into oxygene but can't do the same on Earth?
Of course we can, if by "convert" you mean "split molecules using heat and/or electricity".

The problem is that the process described would not only be useless on Earth, it would be directly harmful to most oxygen-breathing organisms, as it splits CO2 into CO and O, and then recombines pairs of oxygen atoms into O2.

The CO is then vented into the atmosphere, which is something you don't want to do if there are breathing organisms in the immediate vincinity. Carbon monoxide binds strongly to hemoglobin, which means it displaces oxygen and sticks around for long enough to choke you to death even at relatively low concentrations.
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:05 PM   #8
Emerson
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~arch
Posts: 7,231

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
We are closing coal-fired power stations because of CO2 they emit.
We are closing them because politicians need more money in penalties, fees and taxes. Whopping 83% of population believes climate warming is real. They believe politicians. Same time 500 most prominent climate scientists assure there is no reason for concern in their official letter to the UN. This message is so well suppressed by mainstream media (read propaganda agencies) that most people haven't even heard of it.
Of course shutting down plants in West does not reduce emissions, the production of those plants is needed and they will pop up elsewhere in East. Where they produce more emissions than the cleaner ones we shut down in West. Only the jobs in West are lost and wealth flows to East. Thank you, shortsighted greedy politicians in West. The planet is the same, we can ruin our economies and we will, but emissions will stay and nothing will happen to the planet because unlike fake studies which are politically ordered in West those 500 scientists know what they are talking about.
 
Old 04-26-2021, 05:32 PM   #9
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,230

Rep: Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerson View Post
Same time 500 most prominent climate scientists assure there is no reason for concern in their official letter to the UN. This message is so well suppressed by mainstream media (read propaganda agencies) that most people haven't even heard of it.
I hadn't heard of it, so I looked it up and looked at the names - something it would seem you haven't done, or you might have subtracted from your 500 the likes of:
Quote:
Alexandre Krivitzki, Psychoanalyst, Member of the International Psychoanalytical Association
Appo van der Wiel, Senior Development Engineer
Don Schäfer, Former Director Shell Exploration & Production and New Business, Shell
...to pick just three that don't look remotely like climate scientists.

I wondered how many of those 500 people might actually be prominent enough in their field to actually call themselves climate scientists. Apparently 490 of them do not...
Quote:
Originally Posted by https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/letter-signed-by-500-scientists-relies-on-inaccurate-claims-about-climate-science/
And while some outlets described the co-signers as experts in climate science, most are not. As noted in an analysis below, a significant portion of the co-signers are either engineers or professionals in non-technical fields. Only 10 identified themselves as climate scientists.
Heh.

 
Old 04-26-2021, 06:15 PM   #10
ntubski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 3,592

Rep: Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
Growing civilizations, as a general rule, aren't very technically savvy. There's a little oxygen there - so?
Where's this civilization stuff coming from? Elon Musk propaganda? The point is to save mass for future missions:
Quote:
Transporting a one-ton oxygen-conversion machine to Mars is more practical than trying to haul 25 tons of oxygen in tanks from Earth
Quote:
Originally Posted by igadoter View Post
They can convert CO2 on Mars into oxygene but can't do the same on Earth?
There's already lots of ways to convert CO2 to oxygen on Earth. Planting a tree for example. You can't plant a tree on Mars.
 
Old 04-26-2021, 06:45 PM   #11
Bonzoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Costa Rica
Distribution: Antix21a,Parrot rolling,MXfce19.3,Sparky Openbox
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntubski View Post
Where's this civilization stuff coming from? Elon Musk propaganda? The point is to save mass for future missions:



There's already lots of ways to convert CO2 to oxygen on Earth. Planting a tree for example. You can't plant a tree on Mars.
You tried ?
 
Old 04-26-2021, 08:57 PM   #12
Ser Olmy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,976

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonzoo View Post
You tried ?
Erm, I don't think one has to try that in order to conclude that it would certainly fail. It's not quite as silly as trying to plant a tree on the moon, but pretty close.
 
Old 04-27-2021, 06:17 AM   #13
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,230

Rep: Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ser Olmy View Post
Erm, I don't think one has to try that in order to conclude that it would certainly fail.
You might like to tell NASA that they're wasting their time then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2005/mars_plants.html
"Our idea is to enable plants to survive on Mars by adding features from microscopic organisms called extremophiles that live in the most inhospitable environments on Earth," said Dr. Wendy Boss of North Carolina State University. Boss and her colleague, Dr. Amy Grunden, also of North Carolina State, head the research team working on this project.
Quote:
Originally Posted by https://www.nasa.gov/feature/can-plants-grow-with-mars-soil/
In reality, the soil on Mars actually does have the nutrients plants would need to survive on Mars! There may not be the right amount of nutrients depending on where astronauts land on the Red Planet, so fertilizers may need to be added to the soil.
 
Old 04-27-2021, 06:47 AM   #14
ntubski
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 3,592

Rep: Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931Reputation: 1931
Yes, some hypothetical genetically modified tree might survive in a greenhouse on Mars. There aren't any trees existing today that you can plant on Mars (nor any greenhouse existing to plant them in). Whereas the news is about a machine that works today on Mars.

Also, let me anticipate the obvious next question by saying that I haven't personally checked for greenhouses on Mars, but I'm still pretty confident about there not being any
 
Old 04-27-2021, 07:18 AM   #15
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,230

Rep: Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050Reputation: 1050

Nobody said anything about surviving. :P

Anyway, the point is surely that, on Mars the conversion machine is currently the optimal solution, but on Earth there are already more efficient options.

I don't understand the apparent desire to keep using dirty methods of producing energy, augmented with a machine to clean-up unwanted emissions, rather than simply using known cleaner methods in the first place.

 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: NASA's Martian helicopter runs Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-23-2021 12:01 AM
LXer: Open NASA – An Interview with Nick Skytland from NASA LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 10-10-2012 07:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration