GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
But the energy that you use doesn't actually come from the company you appear to be buying it from. It comes from all the companies that collectively feed power into the network. The idea that you are buying it from one company rather than another, as I might buy eggs from Sainsbury rather than Tesco, is a complete legal fiction. And economics gets distorted whenever fictions of this kind are treated by law as facts. Look at all the damage the idea of "intellectual property" has done to software.
In the same way, waste removal is a public good, so it should be paid for through local taxation, just like street lighting and sewerage. In my locality, landfill waste, food waste and waste for recycling are paid for in this way, but garden waste has to be paid for separately. I refuse to pay on principle because I have already paid for it with my rates. If they refuse to do the job I've paid for, I can't force them to do it, but I can refuse to let myself be scammed for extra payments. So when I generate garden waste in summer, I take it down to the tip myself. It's an extra task but it pays for itself in the satisfaction I feel in not allowing myself to be a cretin and pay twice over.
There might be some justification for making people pay for landfill waste in order to reduce waste and improve recycling. But if you charge for recycling too, you give people no incentive to do it.
Pay-as-you-go meters are not widely used these days, but they are inflicted on poor people who have failed to pay their energy bills. You see, there are laws against actually cutting off energy supplies to families containing children or vulnerable adults, so the companies cheat by using PAYG meters that just don't deliver unless they are fed. That way they can say they haven't cut these people off, they have cut themselves off by not paying.
I think you have a point when you say that a nationalised industry just needs to pay its way whereas private industry needs to make a profit to pay its shareholders. The counter argument is that competition between companies can improve service and bring down prices. The problem is that this argument doesn't work for natural monopolies like gas, electricity and water, which is why I think these should be run as public services.
Indeed any captive market is exploited by the players in it, this lie that there is a free market is just that a lie they tell for the justification they make for the exploitation. With things like computers or other goods with many many players in the mix there is competition, but where the low number of players involved. Like with the ram and hard drives, the processors it is all exploitation of their dominant positions for higher than would be prices. It is the same with everything, then the problem of the captive regulators, like we have with the CRTC the Canadian Radio and Telecommunications Commission, who in theory are tasked with regulation all the telcos. Well it is revolving door of telco executives on the board who keep making anti-consumer regulations that cost us billions a year in extra fess. I stop now but the list is endless I could go on just as long about it too...
According to the Which website, my new supplier is EDF. That's one of the big six, so the terms probably won't be particularly good (though on the other hand, the chances of them going bust are virtually zero!). I haven't heard officially from OFGEM yet but Which says customers were moved over yesterday.
I'm thinking of perhaps moving from them to Octopus who have a very good reputation. I've rather gone off the idea of finding cheap deals via a comparison website. There's no value in it being cheap if they can't maintain their business on those terms.
Here that doesn't happen. You get transferred to a new company seamlessly and the electrical current and gas continue to flow in the mean time.
It is good to live in west europe!
I live also in europe, but state is very chaotic, corruption, and companies going bankrupty. energy, water, trash, everything sometimes.
I have just received two emails. One is from GNE apologising for "inconvenience caused" (presumably by their bankruptcy, not by the borderline threatening email they sent me a few days ago!). The other is from EDF confirming that they are now my supplier. They claim that "all customers will see a price decrease versus their current tariff until at least 30 September 2021^." Hmm.
@teckk: I'm going through the new supplier's FAQ and they do a pay-as-you-go tariff with a monthly bill such as you describe. But I don't think I want to do that.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.