obobskivich |
08-18-2021 11:34 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lysander666
(Post 6276345)
You haven't actually answered the question.
|
No need to be rude. Your inference is also maybe incorrect - as wpeckham said, the question, as asked, is problematic. There's nothing about the current state of Pinephone, at least running Manjaro, that isn't suitable for day-to-day use - that is, the distro itself is stable enough, applications build and run, the battery charging works (for a time the kernel would cap the battery charge for safety), the peripherals on the device work (e.g. camera, modem, touchscreen, etc) and you've got a fully functioning touchscreen computer in the palm of your hand (just like an iPhone or an Android device). However that doesn't mean it has the same software compatibility - it isn't an iOS or Android device, so if you insist on using 'apps' then you'll probably be waiting forever for that to happen. However (with limitations around it being ARM rather than x86, along with its relative performance, memory, form factor, etc as applicable), it can do anything any other linux-powered computer can do. That doesn't make it any more or less 'real' as a 'smartphone' - like I said, best to think of them like gaming consoles rather than general purpose systems. Your question is a bit like asking if a Playstation is a 'suitable console' based on whether or not it can play Super Mario Bros - it's an example of a True Scotsman fallacy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman). Also remember that in many cases, the 'app' is just a skinned, application-specific browser that connects the user to whatever web portal/site/server that the provider/organization/whatever is offering, usually to circumvent the browser and security/privacy/etc features that it may try to enforce, and/or to tailor the UI for a mobile device. A lot of modern cloud-based 'services' still offer a browser-based variant of their 'service' in order for things to work on desktops and laptops so a modified variant of the response could also include: "if you can do it in Firefox/Chrome/etc it will also work" - but I guess I assumed that was safely implied.
|