Linux complexity versus BSD simplicity & efficiency
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When your forum title is: "Linux [equals ...] complexity versus BSD [equals ...] simplicity & efficiency," then I consider your decision to have already been made.
"Go, therefore, in the path that you have chosen."
And then – as we all do – "deal with the inevitable complexity(!) that you will(!!) find there."
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 07-05-2022 at 01:05 PM.
Yes, I have, and am prepared to move to OpenBSD if (when) it becomes necessary. I can see advantages and disadvantages to both operating systems, but there are only two things stopping me:
(1) Inertia. A few years ago I decided to migrate to OpenBSD and thought as good way of starting would be to learn more about Unix like systems first, so Part A of the plan was to switch to Slackware first. I found a system that did things my way, did everything I needed and allowed me to avoid trends in Linux I wanted to get away from - all with much less effort than I was expecting. So I'm still on Part A and don't look like progressing in the near future.
I agree, Slackware is *that* good.
I have tried OpenBSD and found it fairly easy to use.In some ways it is simpler than Slackware, especially if you use pkg_add to install precompiled binary packages. I liked it, but not as much as Slackware. This may be fanciful, but I really think the personalities of the two 'BDFLs' plays a part here - Slackware is just more 'fun' than OpenBSD. Perhaps Patrick is more 'benevolent' than Theo!
. . . . . basically. Once developers gain interests, new drivers are available.
I suspect this is not as easy as it sound like. If proper documentation exists for every piece of hardware, then yes. But if not, then it take a lot of trial and failure and still the driver may never get properly stable.
As a hardware guy here with reverse engineering experience, depending on what you are doing each device a certain amount of information. You can piece together a fair amount. Finer touches are the real hard graft.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.