GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
So I'm still in the market for a new PC, and since my budget is relatively tight, I've decided to go AMD. (An EE model, though, so it remains on-par power-wise with the Core 2 Duos)
Do you think it's worth waiting for K10 and the "Phenom" processors? Or should I just buy now and possibly upgrade later?
Also, what's L3 cache? I noticed it on the Wikipedia article for K10, but I haven't seen that before.
Of course, if Intel can drop the price of a Core 2 Duo by a good 40$, this is mostly a moot post, because I'd totally jump ship to Intel. Sure, they're anti-competitive, they're fighting the OLPC, and well it's Intel, but they did open-source their video drivers, and have the better CPUs. But I have faith in AMD. But not ATI.
There's always something better around the corner.That way you can go and wait forever - besides if you are on a tight budget it wont help to wait for K10.
If they stink you don't want it and if they bitchslap Intel prices will be sky high.
L3 cache is a memory cache where instructions get cached in the CPU.Generally the bigger the faster the CPU is in real world use although not a lot faster.
Cache used to be more important for Intel than for AMD - dunno if that is still valid.
L1 cache is the cache on the processor die.
L2 is the cache on the motherboard.
AMD once before integrated this L2 cache in the processor chip (AMD K6-III); not 100% sure if it was integrated on the die, but I think it was. The cache on the motherboard then became the L3 cache.
L1 cache is the cache on the processor die.
L2 is the cache on the motherboard.
AMD once before integrated this L2 cache in the processor chip (AMD K6-III); not 100% sure if it was integrated on the die, but I think it was. The cache on the motherboard then became the L3 cache.
Hate to do that but I don't think this is correct.There is no cache on the mobo.
That's not my fault I have a ASUS P5A motherboard for the K5/6, and it has on board cache. The K6-III has integrated L2 cache, so there is my L3 cache.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.