GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
the NEW is starting to ware off 4K is 2years old
the next generation of monitors is due to come out
with faster refrish and wireless connection
new ways of controlling back lighting
etc
etc
etc
Manufacturers will bring out something 'better' just after you have purchased the 'best' available right now, it is called business.
Six months to two years down the line is when the next 'big thing' gets released, but they are usually working on the one for release after that one already. It is the way that manufacturers stay in business, some people always have to have the latest/best of everything.
I used to have a 19" 1440x900 monitor, but I gave it away, it was just too big for my desktop usage.
I replaced it with a nice little 11.6" 1366x768 monitor - (but I mainly use a 17" 5:4 1280x1024).
Can you imagine how good text (including in terminals and IDEs) would look on a 4K monitor? I would love to have one for coding, writing, LQ-posting, and other text-heavy uses.
Keep in mind 300 dots per inch is considered the bare minimum for a printer, while an average 1920x1080 22" monitor is a third as good.
Just yesterday I was looking for a 17'' notebook with a 4k panel. Kind of funny because I was happy with FHD for years, but suddenly became aware last week that the chars in the consoles do look better on my 14'' FHD notebook than on the 17''... .
So probably to sum it up, no need for 4k until your brain makes the switch (and probably only for panels from 17'' onwards)
Text & fonts were created in the days of low resolution & memory.Some are extremely crude. I would be surprised if things looked better on 4k. Have you vector fonts?
Text & fonts were created in the days of low resolution & memory.Some are extremely crude. I would be surprised if things looked better on 4k. Have you vector fonts?
they were also created to print things out. not so crude.
they are also still being created and improved all the time.
anyhow, my perception tells me clearly that fonts look better the more pixels they use - the larger they are - which on a 4k monitor wouldn't be larger but more dense, nicer.
of course, vectorized fonts we talk about.
i can see how bitmap fonts wouldn't look very good on a hi res monitor.
Want to test both your eyes and your graphics systems? The link below is just one example of a video shot in 4K UltraHD. It is a tour of the International Space Station so it takes a moment to realize it is all ergonomic, human sized, and soon you can see the many labels everywhere and note the clarity of the numbers and letters. The best part is that there is a Settings button which allows us to experience different resolutions. It can be particularly instructive to choose "doubling". Doing this shows just how complex and fine graphic images are and how the value of pixels adds up to impact our eyes and brains. There are thresholds at which doubling is an immense gift to the eyes and others that are much more subtle.
Like much of technology we also acclimate. Just think of processor power, what speed once impressed us can, going back, be absolutely painful and we wonder how we ever put up with it let alone thought it was fast. T recall a time on a similar forum where a case was being made for never needing more than 1MB if video ram since that would render 1024 x 768 on a 17 inch screen, Now both that resolution and size seems inadequate and it isn't all just from the switch from CRTs.My current video card which is soon due for an upgrade has 2048 MB video ram by comparison.
In any case, see for yourself the incremental differences in resolution for as far as your system will take you. Do be certain of your rig's capabilities before you switch.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.