GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by macewan geez, i feel like a caveman with my ipod mini - black/white screen, curb scrappers & a kick stand.
Don't feel bad man. I'm still rocking the portable CD player. Well, I do have a mp3 player that uses mini-CD's but I don't really consider that an mp3 player...
Originally posted by cs-cam iPods just mount as a mass-storage device in linux don't they?
Yes, and there are several KDE applications which understand how to browse the iPod and upload MP3s to it.
If your problem is you cannot purchase music through iTunes I feel for you and actually agree with you, but if you bought the iPod only to use it as an MP3 player and USB or Firewire hard drive, well, I think you just need to do a little digging.
I tried the 60GB iPod with Linux and it works wonderfully - SuSE even automounted it for me, so I didn't even have to mount it. Excellent stuff. I was able to copy MP3s to it, back off, so when I buy a dedicated MP3 player, I am definitely buying an iPod. My only complaint about the iPod is the "nonreplaceable" battery, but when the Li-Polymer gives up the ghost I'll worry about it then. FWIW I have an iPaq 3670 I use daily and the Li-Polymber battery is still going strong.
Originally posted by cereal83 I have never been a fan of Apple so I say their products suck. If their products were so good then so many more people would be using them IMO.
Originally posted by KingMoffa I knew I would need to use iTunes to put songs onto my nano , unless I did something exotic.
Yes, something really exotic, like install amaroK and enjoy a plug-and-play interface enabling syncing your existing amaroK playlists with your iPod, or *gasp* mount it like any other mass storage device and just *gasp* drag and drop the mp3 files you want to listen to. OMG, it will just work, and is about as easy as iTunes!
Quote:
What i did not expect was my inability to charge it from linux. That really really really sucks.
Yeah, it's annoying that USB slots don't supply 5v when booted into Linux. Oh wait, they do. Nevermind.
Quote:
It does charge every now and again from linux , but often is unreliable.
It is likely a hardware issue, such as, is your iPod plugged into the USB port directly, into a powered hub, or an unpowered hub?
Quote:
This doesn't happen on my ibook. (and no its not my linux box , i have several of them).
Re-read the above before you come back here whining and bashing for Linux. Asking for help is one thing, bashing the platform, even out of ignorance, only makes you come across as being a troll.
Just because iPod mounts as a "mass-storage device" doesn't mean it's necessarily compatible. You can get it to mount that way in Windows as well, however, I had to reformat my iPod after trying to manually add files in Windows...
Originally posted by aysiu I don't know if I agree with this. If anything, I'd say Apple screws over the loyal every few months. My sister-in-law got an iPod last summer. What does Apple do out of the blue two weeks later? It lowers the price of all its iPods $100 US. My wife got a Powerbook last fall--G4, the latest. What does Apple do three months later? It releases new G4 Powerbooks at the same price with drop-protection and a better trackpad system. Mac Minis come out and Mac afficionados snatch them up right away--dealing with a measly 256 MB of RAM or paying for a more suitable memory base. What does Mac do a few months later? 1. Announce it's moving to Intel 2. Bump up the base memory for the same price.
No, Mac does not cater to the loyalist I don't think. I'm not sure how their "halo effect" is doing, but I believe their desktop marketshare is something like 5% (maybe I'm wrong) and their MP3 player marketshare is something like 70%, so they may not be recruiting Windows users for Mac computers, but they've just about dominated the portable music player market.
This is how businesses work and operate, it's called revenue for the product they make. If you owned a business and created a product, let's say 1 million units and you've sold 750,000 of them so far, wouldn't you want to sell the rest of them before your new and improved product is announced and is available for sale? This is totally normal in the tech industry, you can buy the most hip up-to-date product one week and next week there's something better, live with it or wait a little longer if your going to complain that your product is outdated within a few months, cause it's gonna happen. What do you expect, Apple or any other company to create a product and just stop developing anything new.
I understand the business model.
I'm not an idiot.
But part of a good business model is also rewarding loyal customers. If you don't have loyal customers, you don't have a business any more.
Also, new releases, cheaper prices, and "free" upgrades don't need to come out so close to one another--let people enjoy what they bought for a while... then, do the upgrade. I mean, it wasn't that long after releasing Tiger that Apple then announced they were moving to Intel.
Originally posted by aysiu I understand the business model.
I'm not an idiot.
But part of a good business model is also rewarding loyal customers. If you don't have loyal customers, you don't have a business any more.
Also, new releases, cheaper prices, and "free" upgrades don't need to come out so close to one another--let people enjoy what they bought for a while... then, do the upgrade. I mean, it wasn't that long after releasing Tiger that Apple then announced they were moving to Intel.
I guess some people will always see or view things differently. I think the rapid deployment of services is a good thing to me. It shows the company is thriving to better their products. Unlike companies like Microsoft who wait years to release new products it seems, sometimes even patches to fix their software even.
But that's probably one reason I don't buy my software and mainly stick with OpenSource software and I rarely upgrade my computers and components. I upgrade every couple of years, trying to maintain the latest and greatest costs too much and then bitching about it really proves nothing to me. I'm not picking on you, I'm just picking on the whole philosophy behind your views on technology and gadgets, etc.
There is plenty of competition though, don't like a company, their products or how they market and sell their products, don't buy their products.
Hmmm, with regards to one of the posts earlier up. My ipod works in linux, I don't dispute that. It's just that it was a mission for me to get it to work. i had to recompile the kernel to disable UFI_partition or some such.
I just feel that as a customer I am entitled to certain rights. one of those being support. Now, I don't think i'm being unreasonable. I don't demand linux support as a matter of course, although that would be nice. What i do want is for a company to realise that a large linux user base has sprung up and they have done nothing to address this.
Consider Google. If you visit their labs you might see most of the products are for windows, BUT they have a notice saying that they hope to have linux support in the future. Isn't that nice? Isn't that service? heck, I pay apple, I don't pay google, yet google gives me better service? what gives?
DVD jon has an application out that allows people to download from itunes from linux. Go to his blog and check it out. If he can do it, without knowing the interface to the itunes server, what's stopping apple from writing a supported program. that works how they want it to? I might still use dvd jon's software but thats my choice. right now i have no choice.
Consider Skype. My linux version isn't on a par with the windows version, but at least I have a version!!! They are considering the consumer. That's why I'll stay a customer.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.