GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've looked at it from afar for quite a few years but don't think highly enough of social control media in any form to actually make any accounts. I do like the idea of having separate instances for different topics / communities / goals. Two concerns of many are the abusive javascript and the centralized blacklists. The latter kind of defeat the purpose of federated communications.
Then the instances do seem to come and go as the various admins burn out from either administrative work or content moderation or just plain having their budgets depleted.
That said, if you feel like trying to set up your own instance, I'd still say go for it. If you would prefer to join an existing instance, then there is a little too much choice and it will take a bit of investigation to find an appropriate instance or two:
I have been using it for the past 2 weeks and really like it so far. My feed shows me exactly what I want based on the people I am following without the 'algorithm' deciding what I should see.
There are multiple instances (think email servers where you can create an account) and each instance can talk to and get feeds from all the other instances (Just like you can email anyone on any server). You can follow folks from any instance on your instance.
Some points to remember:
* Text Search doesn't work across instances because that would need every instance to be aware of all the posts on all instances (This search thing is annoying as my mind doesn't translate text to hastag automatically so it takes a bit of hit and try to find stuff)
* Use Hastags to search as they are propagated across
I have been using it for the past 2 weeks and really like it so far. My feed shows me exactly what I want based on the people I am following without the 'algorithm' deciding what I should see, ...
It's good that you have found a tool you like but I think that it's important to re-iterate that the "'algorithm'" in either Twitter or Facebook does NOT control, for the most part, what I see.
Last edited by mjolnir; 11-19-2022 at 01:30 PM.
Reason: Spelling
It's good that you have found a tool you like but I think that it's important to re-iterate that the "'algorithm'" in either Twitter or Facebook does NOT control, for the most part, what I see.
Can you please expand on what you mean by this? Facebook doesn't show me every post made by the people i follow even in the chronological view. It prioritises posts from folks you interact with the most. No idea how it prioritises posts when not in chronological view.
Twitter non chronological view shows all trending stuff and the most popular posts etc as well. All of which is managed by an algorithm. One of the things that was promised after the recent ownership change was that Twitter's algorithm would be opensourced and available for review. But that hasn't happened yet.
I use it, from both Linux desktop and Android phone.
I like it.
No adds, and many of the people there are either Techi, or Tech adjacent and "get it".
There is no "Big Money" driving how it operates, so ethics and manners matter: but how much depends upon the opinions, ethics, and manners of the syadmin that owns the server you live on.
BTW: Nothing stops you from living on more than one at the same time!
It is NOTHING like Twitter, Facebook, Google+, or anything that went before other than (perhaps) a kind of Fidonet brought into the 21st Century. (Okay, I actually AM that old and geeky! I ran ANP BBS back in the day.)
So what are good servers? I browsed a page on the Mastodon site which had a lot of servers on it but nothing jumped out at me as a community I'd really profit from joining. Like this one for example!
"Over 1 million people have joined Mastodon since October 27. Between that and those who returned to their old accounts, the number of active users has risen to over 1.6 million today, which, for context, is over 3 times what it was just about two weeks ago."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.