GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
grub, its cleaner and more reliable (no LILILILI)
you don't have to reinstall grub every time you recompile your kernel and the config file is much easyer to use. just my
nice poll Alison
If you look in the slack fourm, I wrote a very nice howto on how to remove lilo and install grub.
wow, you're like my age, now I feel less alone 8^)
Ehrm... You still need a boot loader. Even Windows has a boot loader, but it's not very interactive.
When the computer boots, the BIOS reads the first track on the hard disk (the Master Boot Record) and starts executing the code there. That code then loads the OS.
Grub is the best. I always forget to run lilo:*aaa compiles new kernel>types reboot>smacks himself on the head during shutdown process when he realizes he didn't run lilo*. Plus I can choose the kernel at boot without it having ot be in the cfg file.
Distribution: Lots of distros in the past, now Linux Mint
Posts: 748
Rep:
Sorry grubbers, but I have to stick with tried and true. It may not be elegant in all situations, but it ALWAYS works. When it's not perfect "out of the box" as it were, there's almost alway a link to a fix. Grub is elegant, but hasn't really been beaten to death like it's predecessor. I've tried it, but for my applications, it offers no real advantages.
Not that it's not great, just that LILO works for me.
Learned LILO, understand it's config and the options in it. Tried to switch a few months back but the config was just not that 'easy' when moving from LILO... Since they both have ~ the same abilities/limitations it's simply a matter of personal choice. And if you don't have one, and are simply looking for one (and have never had the need to modify either config file until now) then I'd say go for Grub. Why? Because it's popularity is growing quickly. The guru's will slowly turn towards it, and soon you'll find it very well supported. At least that's how I see it
none, i can't get any working
if tried grub and it just freezes and says
GRUB
an then stops
Lilo says
10101010101010101
1010101010101010101010
1010101010101010110
if anyone has had these problems, then help
Originally posted by aaa Grub is the best. I always forget to run lilo:*aaa compiles new kernel>types reboot>smacks himself on the head during shutdown process when he realizes he didn't run lilo*. Plus I can choose the kernel at boot without it having ot be in the cfg file.
This is so true!
It happened to me all the time... that's why i switched to GRUB.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.