GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
a bit of a ding dong in progress between the tech world and the Australian government. My first reaction is "byeeee". Not sure it is as easy as that though.
Our PM is a no-nonsense "tough guy". For once I hope he sticks to his guns
[EDIT] Post edited based on the contribution below. Thanks for picking this up.
Anyhow, the story here appears to be along the lines that the Australian Government is trying to get Google and Facebook (and perhaps others) to pay for referencing/linking to news stories.
I can't be arsed deciphering the legalese of that to work out if this is specifically targetting Google & Facebook, or whether it affects any website that links to an Australian news source - the bill doesn't mention Google or Facebook directly, but it does reference "designated digital platform corporation", which might be the necessary language to target them, but might also be saying "anyone on the web that the Australian Government and/or Rupert Murdoch doesn't like"?
They may be in trouble in the US as well. Apparently Biden hates FB; you can hardly blame him after all they did for Trump. He is enthusiastic about the anti-trust case that is currently going through. The Federal Trade Commission wants to break up FB and reconstruct Instagram and WhatsApp as separate companies.
Biden has also said that he wants to revoke Section 230, which defines FB and Twitter as "platforms" that are not responsible for what people post on them. Of course, they both now censor a lot of the posts and tweets that right wing people make, which means they long ago ceased to be platforms and became publishers. You can't have it both ways.
I think google are bluffing, and that they won't pull out. But if they pull 100% of their services, and do the geo-ip blocking, or whatever, an unexpected effect of this might be that gmail goes offline in Oz. Also, the Google Play store could go, affecting Android mobile phones. And because gmail is gone, you couldn't set up a play store account (for which you need a gmail address). No Android updates, obsolete phones, etc.
Why it's interesting is because it underscores the problem of how much we are getting 'assimilated' by what I have heard called The Googleverse.
Last edited by business_kid; 01-25-2021 at 02:11 PM.
I think google are bluffing, and that they won't pull out. But if they pull 100% of their services, and do the geo-ip blocking, or whatever, an unexpected effect of this might be that gmail goes offline in Oz. Also, the Google Play store could go, affecting Android mobile phones. And because gmail is gone, you couldn't set up a play store account (for which you need a gmail address). No Android updates, obsolete phones, etc.
Why it's interesting is because it underscores the problem of how much we are getting 'assimilated' by what I have heard called The Googleverse.
I did think about implications. I have tried to cut down my reliance on Google so the pain to me would be minimal (Google Maps mostly). There could though be indirect consequences not yet known. I am guessing this is the first exchange in the "debate". Typical bluster - you won't let us win so we are taking our ball away. Let's face it though...Google aren't going to pull out
And as per post #5 you can't help thinking that Murdoch is involved somewhere. Our leaders typically accomodate News Corp.
I don't understand why Mr Scott Morrison is so interested in getting more revenue for the news sites. Is he hoping to tax a part of the revenue for government? Not that it's bad in itself.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,755
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnanthaP
I don't understand why Mr Scott Morrison is so interested in getting more revenue for the news sites. Is he hoping to tax a part of the revenue for government? Not that it's bad in itself.
AP
I dare say because News Corp/Rupert Murdoch is telling him the Liberal Party will get a bigger donation if they make Google, etc pay up. Our PM isn't doing it out of the kindness of his heart, that's for sure... The only thing the Liberal Party here cares about is money, even a guy I used to know that worked for them said that. They don't care about anything else apart from $$$$...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.