GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In a quick search I found that Google maps support "Street views" which Nokia's OVI maps don't have. But this is limited to few western countries only.
I want to know if either of them provide much more in depth detail w.r.t the streets, roads and lanes as compared to other.
Any enlightenments? or any links where this comparison is shown without bias?
I use Google Maps on the PC and Ovi Maps on my Nokia - for my uses they are both identical. I forget whether Ovi gets to the full level of detail that Google does, I certainly use the top down satellite view quite often, but how often does anyone need to use the view that shows how you would walk down a street?
but how often does anyone need to use the view that shows how you would walk down a street?
I don't need all this for myself, actually, we have unmanned vehicles which need to move in the streets. For them it is necessary to know whether the lane is one way or two way, names of the streets, landmarks on them, etc.
Now I just compared the National highway 1 in India on both the maps. And the results are clear.
But still, there is not much text on the Google streets too.
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 02-16-2015 at 11:57 PM.
Any enlightenments? or any links where this comparison is shown without bias?
Nokia OVI maps(on a cellphone) don't need internet to work (you can update maps via PC, and use them on the phone without active internet connection), which is a huge plus. Amount of detail depends on your country (AFAIK, map of USA is the most detailed, but for the rest of the world it gets worse) - for example, I couldn't find detailed map of japan for my phone, and it is not uncommon to find a small town without mapped streets , but for *me* ability to work offline is more important than level of detail.
Thanks SigTerm, for us the detailed view of streets is more important than anything else.
But I am looking for a way by which Google maps can be cached too.
and the damn QtMobility doesn't support anything else than OVI maps.
Thanks SigTerm, for us the detailed view of streets is more important than anything else.
But I am looking for a way by which Google maps can be cached too.
and the damn QtMobility doesn't support anything else than OVI maps.
You could try contacting google directly. If you're developing a commercial app on behalf of some company (it sounds like that, for some reason), they should be able to answer your questions (well, in theory).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.