GNU/Linux will never make it because it misses 2 ESSENTIAL features
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
GNU/Linux will never make it because it misses 2 ESSENTIAL features
Now, seriously! I've been searching for this for months and am at my wit's end. They have told me I could do anything in GNU/Linux that I could do in Vista, but as I found the hard way, there are two essential features that GNU/Linux just doesn't have! Now, without them, an operating system is worth zilch to me. Specifically:
1. There is no PRODUCT KEY to enter during the installation of a GNU/Linux system! That means anyone, literally ANYONE can install such an operating system without incurring in ANY LEGAL ISSUES WHATSOEVER! A total deal-braker from where I sit.
2. This flaw may be even worse: NO ACTIVATION is required for a GNU/Linux installation! It just works, and continues working even if you replace the mainboard, the hard drives, the graphics card, add RAM etc. This is just plain ABSURD! How can anyone live with that??? Any -- and I mean ANY -- Windows security flaws just PALE in comparison to that!!!
Any input welcome, but be warned that I WILL NOT BE PERSUADED TO REPLACE MY BELOVED VISTA NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY!
3. Linux doesn't have any secret APIs. I mean... What an omission! How nuts is that!... At least with Vista some of the API's are so good they're kept secret. Why would you want to use a system who's programs can only be as good as anyone else can make for it, when you could use Vista and buy microsoft programs that can use these premium APIs and be 'BETTER' than anyone else can make for it,
And Another!!!
GNU/Linux does not have a cute little doggie to help you with your searches like XP does. How the **** am I supposed to find anything?????
And yet another!!!!
When is linux going to get a decent text editor like Notepad?
P.S.
And Steve Ballmer's a better dancer than that Richard Stallman, so there!
... And here I was all ready to write "troll" all over this thread! You got me! Well done!
And what about:
What's the deal with Linux not shutting down every day for no reason whatsoever? I mean, MS wants you to restart your computer every day to clear your RAM cache, and start off fresh so it doesn't crash! Linux isn't supposed to be shut down every day, so how am I EVER to keep it stable???
For another thing!!!
What's with all them silly names you got in that linux. Potato, Lenny, Jaunty Jackalope, greps, grubs, gnomes, and ELFs!! Slackware? What's trousers got to do with it?
Yes, and this FLOSS is pure evil. I mean no f'n spyware, malware, trojans, viruses etc. What's with that ? I miss the fun I had in XP with all those. I miss them so much, brings a tear to my eye And without the oh so useful registry of Window$, they can't be hidden very well if they did exist. And I miss all the hidden files that only Gates and Ballmer know about. And all those wonderful high-quality apps you had to pay for. They were so go, soon after I installed Linux I put them in a safe place where no-one would look to find them ... the trash can. I think they are safe there.
In order to communicate we have to use the same language like in windows. Spanish for Spain, French for France, Belgic for Belgium, Swiss for Switzerland, Canadian for Canada and so on. How are we going to be abel to communicate with Linux with all the language choices?
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalleanka
And another one.
In order to communicate we have to use the same language like in windows. Spanish for Spain, French for France, Belgic for Belgium, Swiss for Switzerland, Canadian for Canada and so on. How are we going to be abel to communicate with Linux with all the language choices?
Well there is some hope , because in 3 major cities in Europe the city council decide to turn away from windows and use linux instead
And those cities are in 3 different countries
The deal breaker for me is that Linux does absolutely *nothing* unless I tell it to. But Windows does everything for me: it keeps all of its ports open by default, it automagically starts all of the services I need as it boots up, such as movie maker and pc check-up. ActiveX handles code execution so smoothly I don't even notice, and all services have unrestricted access to the kernel, so I can use movie maker even easier. I don't have to worry about choice, either; one Windows fits all. It's amazing really, it's like Microsoft just *knows* exactly what I want to do when I want to do it! Windows will even turn itself off for me. That Linux on the other hand, it would just run all day if I let it...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.