We could actually start a likely long-lived and contentious thread regarding gender and the roles they imply.
I am reminded of a powerful photo I once saw in "Life" magazine sometime in the early 60s. It was a lineup along a swimming pool of some 30 or more bathing suit contestants (I assumed, then, they were all female) and on one end was a beautiful albino girl/lady and on the other far end was a gorgeous, deeply dark girl/lady, truly almost black, and each step in between was a very small increment of skin shade. It was impossible to tell where one left off and another began. I was struck then, first, that skin color isn't a hard line but a continuum and then that expanded that into realizing what we think of as race is largely an illusion as it, too, is a continuum.
Perhaps oddly enough, only a hint of the concept that gender might be a continuum also struck me. I was, I guess, only beginning to become aware that the whole "Me Tarzan. You? Jane." thing was more than just a little a 2 dimensional cardboard cutout. Later I would learn enough more about historic civilizations to understand "Male" and "Female" were defined very differently by different cultures so it stood to reason that much of what we believe and expect is a cultural construct and not at all biological fact.
In a college English Lit class a guy wanted exclusion from an assignment because it meant reading poetry and he literally asked the (male) professor "How can a guy be manly if he is known to read poetry?". A girl asked him "Who defines your masculinity anyway?" and the natural but overlooked contradiction made me laugh out loud. The contradiction I perceived was that I was taught that the ultimate manly man was "his own man", "Captain of his soul" unwilling to be in any way at all submissive yet accepting that "decree" was an act of submission in itself to someones' idea of what defined A Man.
As feminism was in the News and, in addition to the typical male heroes like John Wayne, ladies like Madame Curie, Amelia Earhart and Tallula Bankhead (only years later did I "discover" Frances Farmer) had already been heroes/heroines of mine for their strong individuality and willfulness to do what pleased them, letting the chips fall where they may (screw the neighbors!) I already saw the revolt of a few individuals gaining some level of cultural support and in 1963 I attended the March on Washington (and no, I'm sorry to say, being 16 then meant no driving after dark so I missed one of the most momentous events of the 20th Century regarding Liberty and Level Playing Field, Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech) so I saw it happening in perception of Race, as well.
So, in 2018, I have to ask if a transgender penguin shouldn't be named "Vivian", "Pat" or "Charlie"? or should we totally revolt and name
him "Lulu" or
her "Grunt"?
I can't apologize for going off on this tangent and still be "a manly man" now, can I?
BTW cool article on current changing influences here -
--- Masculine Stereotypes - Boy Talk ---