GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I wonder what will happen some day when the browsing history toxic waste containment area has a spill and suddenly a bunch very visible people get exposed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho
it is an illusion to think oneself completely free of advertising.
" When I am ready to buy, I search for it and buy it myself." - yes, but how did you come to the conclusion that you need a product, and how did you make the choice to buy a particular product?
do you REALLY NEED it? (be honest now!)
would you have found a product that has not been advertised anywhere? how?
I don't think that's what was claimed. I agree with null-user: I've never bought a single thing from a targeted web ad.
Personal data is less protected than ever. On this episode of PoliticKING, Devin Coldewey, writer at TechCrunch, and the ACLU's Neema Singh Guliani, weigh in on the controversial new repeal allowing internet service providers to collect private data without consent, and how these providers use the information about you to make money. Then, former congressman Trey Radel (R-Florida) opens up about his past, politics and family – and the cultural divide that’s ripping America apart.
Obviously, this can't remain the purview of "FCC regulations."
In American jurisprudence, there is already an existing body of law, such as 18 United States Code §2511, that unfortunately is still "in need of an update." It speaks of "oral communication" and then "electronic communication," but these things really don't go far enough in the context of the present technological age.
These are things that are – sooner, rather than later – going to have to be addressed by legislatures throughout the planet, in the form of new laws. (And/Or, specific and purposeful revisions to existing sections such as the above.)
It is not the proper place of regulatory agencies, such as the FCC, to create new laws, nor to push existing laws into uncharted territories – into "use cases" never contemplated by the authors of the original statute(s). Instead, "the authors" ... legislatures ... must become involved. And, we must look to them to craft regulations that are properly suited to the "we live in interesting times" present case.
"Don't ask the FCC to do this ... alone!" They can't. It's not their job. They're not ... The US Congress. (Ditto: "the British Parliament, etcetera etcetera.")
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 04-04-2017 at 08:34 PM.
This is a no win situation. No the FCC should not do this alone, but the problem with Congress is the lobbyists who pretty much bought out the politicians - some for very little:
It should be the other way around. The advertisers should pay us and not the ISP's. If I could sell my private data, I would for the right price. If it were possible.
‘State-imposed thought police’: German politicians, activists slam bill on hate speech & fake news
The German government has approved a new bill on combating hate speech and fake news, under which social networks could face hefty fines if they fail to remove offensive content promptly. Critics denounced the bill as a violation of free speech.
It is worth noting that, as regards the United States, the recent legal action changes nothing. You are as naked and for sale on the internet as you ever have been. Rather it prevents what I consider positive changes that were in the pipeline.
Internet access has become essential to contemporary life. I believe that ISPs should be treated and regulated as common carriers.
OK this is something we can do something about and it's sooo simple
just make your whole browser history one and only one web page if for nothing else a protest to this bullshit
HOW YOU ASK????
simple use a proxy
Congress recently passed a bill that allowed internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon, Charter, and AT&T to sell your online browsing history without your consent. It’s a bill that washes away our right to online privacy. This week President Trump "quietly" signed the bill into law in an attempt to avoid backlash, and his method may have paid off, as the media has paid little attention to the issue.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.