I'm not the one complaining, tell that to all the protesters out there. They need to accept it, and again Jonathan Pie was spot on - this was the result because any sort of dissent or criticism of the left , against Obama, 'You're a racist' , offer valid reasons for NOT voting for Hillary, "You're a sexist" , there is no debate as Jonathan Pie stated.

I don't like Trump, but he is the next President - get over it , suck it up buttercup, or just leave the US. I can't wait for tomorrow's Bill Maher show, I wonder what he will say (since he is against Trump)

Thats anti-semtic sentiment - YOUR'RE anti-semetic!

Sorry but that is what would be said if you criticised any of Israel's policies - they can do no wrong - and will play the race card to their advantage.

So... Is there a silver lining after all, that Hillary lost? I am beginning to think so: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyaFsPKjZdo

No. Business as always! Unless you want to talk right, wrong and education? The only thing to pay for itself... http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ml#post5629200

Considering Hillary's political ambitions there most likely would have been a provocation and further deterioration of relations with Russia. I am not saying we are going going to be full buddy-buddy with them, but I am hoping things will now cool down, because I have a feeling it would have been worse under her actually.

Me too! I wish Trump keeps his word regarding Russia. Because of the drama between Trump and NATO the truth came out:

"Officials in Western Europe say they are dismayed that they now feel compelled to gather intelligence on a man who could be the next president of the United States but believe they have no choice. Moscow
is seen as a direct threat to their interests—both in its aggressive efforts to reshape global alliances and for its power to damage Western Europe, which obtains almost 40 percent of its natural gas from Russia."
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump...-europe-516895

German defense minister:
"Donald Trump has to say clearly on which side he is. Whether he's on the side of the law, peace and democracy or whether he doesn't care about all that and instead he's looking for a best buddy (with Putin)," she said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-tr...-idUSKBN1352SD

The Saudis, Israelis, Qataris, Turks want Syria destroyed. It will be interesting to see if Trump ends up being another yes-man for the Empire. If an American oligarch can't stand up to these people then who can? The American liberal internationalist and some neocons are playing nice now trying to further infect his administration. I'm glad Hillary lost. She wanted a no fly zone and she would have done it. Russia would have had to back away or would have had to retaliate. I personally did not want to find out. Russia had two choices, they either cower and wait until the US Empire runs out of steam, or stand up and fight it knowing very well that parts of the planet will be left uninhabitable which includes Russia and the US. If Hillary won she would have protected Al Qaeda from Russia. I cannot think of a more ridiculous reason to start World War III.

The problem with Western Europe and the German Defense Minister, is that they do not realise that the positioning of NATO's forces almost match the position of the German forces during the start of WWII; Russia sees this as a threat as well. NATO needs to back off for their own sake.

Also Putin has already stated that the US and some of it's so-called allies - Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are directly and indirectly supporting ISIS and other terrorists; and is destabilising the region with no regards to the actual consequences, as the videos I posted earlier show. This time it stops at Syria, Russia has put her foot down and again the US generals KNOW that any sort of maneuvers like before will not work this time unless they really want a full-on war with Russia.

The US has tactical nukes, the Russians don't - they do not need tactical nukes they have full-on nukes - is that what Hillary really wants? There is to be no conventional war this time.

You can now say that I over-estimate the Russians, fine - but are you really willing to write them off and chance it? Lets see, who else did that before? Ah yes, the Germans - remind me again what happened there? The Russians industrialised in a mad dash, and they would have sacrificed all their forces to take all of Germany at that time - just think what they would do when it comes down to a nuclear exchange.... Actually, no, I DON'T want to think about that!