GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have been using Linux since 2004. I can use it quite well but I certainly don't understand all of it, not by a long shot.
I was thinking of building a "Linux from scratch" in the hopes of gaining a better understanding.
I have also been attracted to Minix3 but now that Andy Tanenbaum is retired and the paid developers are looking/found new jobs, I am concerned about it's future.
Hurd sounds so neat but it's development is moving along so slowly.
If I am willing to sink in 200-500 hours of study to master an OS, what would you recommend? Is there a small posix system that is easier to understand then full blown distros like FreeBSD and Linux ?
From these smaller ones, which one do you think is most stable and polished?
What do you think about these targets:
Minix3
Hurd
NetBSD.
Sorry for this odd question, I hope I worded it right...
Does anyone ever master a modern OS? You learn how to do the things you need or find interesting, and that's enough. Even professional systems administrators come here for help on occasions!
LFS is obviously a possibility, although I soon lost patience and gave up. The Arch wiki is indeed the best documentation, so Arch is a good idea. It can certainly be a challenge. I've looked at it twice: the first time it took me a day to set up; the second I lost the network before I'd installed X window, and I never got it back.
Does Linus even understand the 11M lines of code in the Linux kernel ?!
He can't install Ubuntu because it's too hard! There is only so much time in a day and writing a kernel means there isn't much time for anything else, like administration.
I dream of small and simple. When I program, the language does not slow me down, my understanding of the OS is the bottleneck.
Even if I don't end up using Arch, it's sounds like a good place to learn.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.