LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   General (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/)
-   -   drive sequence (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/drive-sequence-327397/)

kpachopoulos 05-26-2005 02:29 PM

drive sequence
 
Is there a specific sequence for IDE drives? I have placed my HD as Primary Master, my cd-rw as secondary master and my dvd-rom as secondary slave; there is nothing for primary slave. However, my dvd-rom is not recognized by the BIOS. In fact when i boot into the BIOS and try to detect it,i find it, but when i reboot it doesn't seem to exist. However, all OSes seem to find it every time. Any ideas?

Mara 05-26-2005 03:25 PM

No special sequence should be needed. Your looks OK. Do you have secondary slave set to auto?

whysyn 05-26-2005 04:07 PM

there seems to be quite a bit of debate on this subject, but i haven't seen much real evidence of "the answer"

one thing of note that i would suggest, i would put one optical drive as slave on the primary, and one on the secondary chain. because of the speed limitations of optical drives (and the throughput/duplex limitations of ide), you may have issues with doing "on the fly" cd duplications with both on the same ide channel.

just my $.02

kpachopoulos 05-27-2005 02:41 AM

I have now set the cd-rw sa secondary master and the dvd-rom as secondary slave and both are been recognised fine. The opposite however (dvd-rom master and cd-rw as slave) hadn't work. Why?

kpachopoulos 05-27-2005 04:28 AM

On the IDE cable i am using for my optical drives, a "hard disk cable" is written as i just noticed. There is another cable with "cd-rom" on it. Have i used the wrong one? Should i change it, or there will be no difference?
Thanks

benjithegreat98 05-27-2005 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocturna_gr
I have now set the cd-rw sa secondary master and the dvd-rom as secondary slave and both are been recognised fine. The opposite however (dvd-rom master and cd-rw as slave) hadn't work. Why?
Did you move the jumpers on the back of the optical drives to denote master and slave?

Megamieuwsel 05-27-2005 05:07 PM

Hmmm...
It always has been my understanding , that the best configuration would be to have each of the optical drives as a slave to a harddrive.(Two IDE-HDs-scenario)
Has something to do with posing the least risc for boot-problems , or so i'm told...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.