Climate change, Ocean temperatures and the Energy Crisis - Discuss.
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I turn 70 this month, and have not ridden a bike in years. My wife is in a wheelchair and on oxygen. Our regular grocery store is 26 miles away, and there is no mass transit between. I think I will drive. I will be very glad when I have the option of driving an all electric car, but that day has not yet arrived.
^ yes but (not) driving a car isn't the only thing that matters. I'm not asking you to do so publicly, but maybe you should consider what else you can do to save the ecosphere. Just because you must drive car doesn't mean you're off the hook!
Distribution: Cinnamon Mint 20.1 (Laptop) and 20.2 (Desktop)
Posts: 1,672
Original Poster
Rep:
If nothing else it's all getting more news coverage. Definitely human exacerbated, the IPCC's report is particularly damming. Now... If politicians and big business would just start listening and focusing on getting a solution. NOW!
It's not just a technical issue. There are several political problems that have to be engaged with if we are going to have any hope of coming out of this alive.
1) If we try to discourage the waste of energy and the use of inappropriate fuels in the way we normally discourage bad behaviour (i.e. by making it more expensive), we are just going to penalise the poor. The rich will complain bitterly about the increased cost of flying abroad but will still go on foreign holidays, while the poor will have to choose between heating their homes with increasingly expensive electricity or putting food on the table. Long before we reach net zero, there will have been a violent social breakdown. To avoid that, we must arrange what is sometimes called a "just transition" in which the costs and benefits of going green are shared out equally.
2) The same thing applies between nations. The developing countries are simply not going to allow their development to be brought to a screeching halt long before they reach the comfortable lifestyle that we enjoy. Also some countries with a low per-capita emission of CO2 have a high total emission because they are so populous. This is particularly true of China and India. There is no justice whatever in asking them to reduce their energy usage when ours is proportionately so much higher, but if they don't, we are all heading for disaster because the planet is affected only by total greenhouse gas emissions and not per-capita ones.
Can anyone find an answer to either of these two points?
It's not just a technical issue. There are several political problems that have to be engaged with if we are going to have any hope of coming out of this alive.
1) If we try to discourage the waste of energy and the use of inappropriate fuels in the way we normally discourage bad behaviour (i.e. by making it more expensive), we are just going to penalise the poor. The rich will complain bitterly about the increased cost of flying abroad but will still go on foreign holidays, while the poor will have to choose between heating their homes with increasingly expensive electricity or putting food on the table. Long before we reach net zero, there will have been a violent social breakdown. To avoid that, we must arrange what is sometimes called a "just transition" in which the costs and benefits of going green are shared out equally.
2) The same thing applies between nations. The developing countries are simply not going to allow their development to be brought to a screeching halt long before they reach the comfortable lifestyle that we enjoy. Also some countries with a low per-capita emission of CO2 have a high total emission because they are so populous. This is particularly true of China and India. There is no justice whatever in asking them to reduce their energy usage when ours is proportionately so much higher, but if they don't, we are all heading for disaster because the planet is affected only by total greenhouse gas emissions and not per-capita ones.
Can anyone find an answer to either of these two points?
Very astute, hazel, and well stated. However it seems to me that abundant cheap energy would go a very long way to completely changing those socio-political situations and reactions. IMHO an important first step is possible by aggressively pursuing thorium salt nuclear power generation. The conundrum there is general public knee-jerk reaction from unjustified fear repels investors that could even consider investing in nuclear of any kind. The only solution is education which is obviously even more important since there are still so many that continue to argue whether or not human caused climate change even exists. Combine that with millions of fundamentalists who are willing to fight, murder and die over petty idealogy, many of whom are fully convinced we are "in End Times" and can only trust their unaided 5 senses... I am sincerely afraid things will have to get much worse before it can even begin to get better.
Whereas I would admit to being a "Fundamentalist" although I wouldn't describe myself that way, and believe folks are blind if they don't see we are in the Last Days as described by Scripture, I am not willing to fight or die fighting over my ideology. We are and always were pacifists.
And no, short of Divine intervention I don't see a possible way out of today's mess without an awful lot of carnage. And that's only today's mess. The sad fact is that this forum reaches into the 1st world; Global Warming reaches into the 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th worlds.
While i have zero experience of "divine intervention" I am quite aware of how many "prophecies" for End Times have come and gone. Even if this time it is so, people can't live like that by expecting that not only their own but everyone's life is facing total apocalypse at any moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Dylan
He not busy being born is busy dying
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Thomas
Do not go gentle into that sweet night
Rage. Rage! against the dying of the light
While i have zero experience of "divine intervention" I am quite aware of how many "prophecies" for End Times have come and gone. Even if this time it is so, people can't live like that by expecting that not only their own but everyone's life is facing total apocalypse at any moment.
Prophecies for different periods have come, been fulfilled, and gone. To give a sense of perspective, Jerusalem's destruction started to be foretold in the 8th century B.C. and was finally fulfilled in 607 BC. It's really fairly big headed to expect the whole shooting match to be wrapped up in my few years on the planet, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't live as if the end was imminent. Because either death or the Master's return will overtake me in any event. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage...25&version=NIV
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.