Camera n photography forums
Hi all,
I am in need of a list of some of the best and active forums with respect to cameras ! I am planning to buy a camera for nature photography costing around $600. I need some professional guidance for buying it ! I could have searched Google for it, but since i don't have any technical knowledge about cameras, there was a probability of mis-guidance ! Thanks ! |
Moved to General (not a Linux question)
Specifically for digital cameras, the best one a few years ago was: http://www.dpreview.com/ Also, Yahoo used to have many good groups. I have not been to any in several years. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I too am looking at upgrading my camera
though I am more interested in astro-photography three things are needed four if you can get it * lots of pixels * good quality lenses * a sturdy, preferably wooden, tripod * and you can get it - a remote control floppy |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mercedes Benz,Rolex, Neil Diamond, The Wiggles ??? he should find one or make one floppy |
Quote:
Found 2 sources without even trying....... |
Lot's of pixels?----no, you need "enough" pixels. "Enough" is generally determined by the print size and viewing distance.
Once you have enough pixels, more does nothing for image quality**. To improve quality from here, you need larger pixels--eg with a full-frame sensor. **In the early days ( < ~4 Mpixels), there was some advantage in having a higher pixel count and then down-sampling to "enough"---the re-sampling reduced color artifacts caused by the Bayer filter. With sensors now at 8 Mp and larger, color artifacts are not as big an issue. |
Quote:
I would still say go for lots of pixels print size and distance are important - no argument there but with more pixels - it will will be easier to digitally manipulate, enhance etc, the downside being needing a fairly capable computer to manipulate such large files. however you raise the issue of filtering anishakaul - you will need a brand of camera that has a good range of lens accessories :- filters, hoods etc floppy |
The pixel count sets the upper limit on resolution. Once you have "enough" pixels, then other factors dominate. Within any given design, there is always a balance, and improving any particular parameter will not help overall performance. There have been quite a few articles recently arguing that there is too much marketing emphasis on the pixel count.
For nature photography, think also about panorama stiching SW (free) and Printers (expensive) |
Quote:
I don't know how much difference can be seen in the quality of image in case I purchase a camera costing $600 and a camera costing $450. Kindly guide ! |
panorama stitching takes several pictures of the same general location (eg, you are at the beach and you take a picture of the right, center and left) and joins them into one, usually they dont look that great IMHO.
|
Quote:
What's the fun in taking the pictures right, center and left and then joining them into one ? What's IMHO ? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
IMHO = "In My Humble Opinion"
Stitching is used whenever you want a field of view that is larger than what the camera provides---or if you want to get extremely high resolution. For example, many digital cameras have a "wide angle" limit equivalent to a 35mm lens on a film camera. To get a wider view, I routinely shoot 2 or three pictures and stitch them. There are MANY situations where stitching is the only way to get the picture---eg if you are close to a tall building. The premier tool is Panotools, which has at least 2 really good GUI front ends: PTAssembler (Windows) and Hugin (Linux) For some really good examples of what can be done, go here: http://www.tawbaware.com/index.html Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM. |