| k3lt01 |
01-24-2012 02:01 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
(Post 4582770)
In some ways, yes, but there is a bit of history between k3lt01 and H_TeXMeX_H.
|
Lol, he has never announced to me that I'm on his ignore list :p
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
(Post 4582770)
I'd disagree. It doesnt make the point H_TeXMeX_H is trying to make useless, but it does reduce the quality of the arguement IMO.
|
My useless comment was in response to the statement that this is a forum not a court of law. If there is no influence in sites like this then his comments are useless. However, there is alot of influence in fora like LQ and I think things need to be put in a more realistic light. I don't think it is fair on either side for the discussion to be one sided, if that means asking some uncomfortable (for some) questions and commenting on methods then so be it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
(Post 4582770)
Still, its not worth pulling the daggers out over terminology.....besides being pointless, it reduces the quality of the whole thread. Comon caravel and k3lt01, you're both better posters and thinkers than that. Degrading into mud slinging and 'who said what to who' isnt really going to do much but derail what could still be an interesting discussion and exchange of points of view. :D
|
Point taken ;) |
