GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
All of them are biased in some way. The only way to get somewhat accurate information is to track a lot of different ones, then you can see what's going on. It's sadly not as easy as finding "one that isn't biased". This world spins everything. And even if you do you still have to take everything with a grain of salt so to speak.
Bias is relative.
There's a little bias, and there's a lot.
I like to choose news sources with as little bias as possible.
But even the bias can be part of the news, e.g. how certain news items are viewed in different countries.
BTW, news and media organisations are required to uphold journalistic, professional and legal standards. Amongst other things, this means stories are researched and verified before they go public. That's why I prefer to get news from there, not from social media "content creators" who aren't bound by (most) such regulations. Of course there's nothing wrong with a little opinionating every now and then, but one shouldn't mistake that for information.
One could make a shell script using select for a menu.
This was my first thought as soon as I saw your helpful links.
I chose mpv to play them, your script hardly needed any adjusting. Thanks.
Code:
#!/usr/bin/bash
feeds=(
#Deutsche Welle
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GE_SfNVNyqk
#Sky News
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9Auq9mYxFEE
#Newsy
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gxJ6eJtGYFw
#Reuters
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OsksEXx2X9M
#PBS
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bhM2rT38JXE
#Fox
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FACbviA9Umc
#ABC (US)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Ma8oQLmSM
#ABC (OZ)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vOTiJkg1voo
)
PS3="
Select an option.: "
while :; do
clear
options=(DW Sky Newsy Reuters PBS Fox ABC-us ABC-au Quit)
COLUMNS=1 # force vertical layout for select
select opt in "${options[@]}"; do
for index in "${!options[@]}"; do
if [ "${options[$index]}" = "${opt}" ]; then
case "$opt" in
Quit) clear; exit;;
*) #Do something with a ytdl and a media player
echo "You chose > $opt - ${feeds[$index]}"
mpv "${feeds[$index]}"
;;
esac
fi
done
break
done
done
Some content creators claim to have more subscribers than channels like CNN & MSNBC. And some claim to do investigative journalism: https://thegrayzone.com/.
News without analysis is nothing despite the fancy sets and throbbing music and the multiple "brought to you by ..." reminders of who's running the show.
And many hold "fact-checkers" in high esteem but the funding of this brood is interesting.
Some content creators claim to have more subscribers than channels like CNN & MSNBC. And some claim to do investigative journalism: https://thegrayzone.com/.
News without analysis is nothing despite the fancy sets and throbbing music and the multiple "brought to you by ..." reminders of who's running the show.
And many hold "fact-checkers" in high esteem but the funding of this brood is interesting.
But Mary Poppins will make things right.
#1 NEWS without analysis is just facts. I value just facts, but also objective analysis. Enough "just facts" can lead to being able to detect analysis that is not objective!
#2 fact checkers have value (See SNOPES) as long as they actually check and present facts and have no political agenda. Supposed "fact checkers" that cherry pick facts to prove a point are called "liars". Look for the ones that debunk conservative lies, and also debunk liberal lies, to ensure that they have no political agenda. (Bonus points for finding ones that are financed by readers and not corporate donations! Those avoid having undue commercial interests, which can be as bad or worse than the political ones! )
and of course yle.fi. <- national news agency of finland.
+1 for YLE's Politiikkaradio, they've had some very interesting and well-informed interviews on the current conflict. Wish I could recommend it to more people here.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.