Because Shiny Things Are Fun - The New New Windows v Linux Thread
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Obviously a tactic to distract from the NSA's constant exploitation of Windows security vulnerabilities. And yet people are probably going to buy it...
I agree. Linux won the war because it is the better choice, regardless of what Microsoft does or what "most" "almost all" or "normal" people do about this simple statement of fact.
There will be many noble battles with ignorance and other very important and multifaceted aspects of the world(s) we live in long after anyone who could ever imaginably read these words we type into this fragile internet tonight, but there are always battles long after heroes have shuffled off this mortal coil.
But we won this one. Linux is unquestionably a better OS than Microsoft, Apple, Android, etc. The third sentence is irrelevant even if we might have different opinions about it.
If you're exclusively looking at interfaces and ignoring the very different aspects of Windows/KDE and Aqua/GNOME, sure. Also, KDE is not Linux-specific, as it runs on multiple *nices (the *BSDs, OpenSolaris derivatives for Plasma 4, and obviously Linux).
Quote:
and Plan 9 (/proc). They have clearly won.
Plan 9 is a free Unix-family OS - even though it isn't Linux, they share similar underlying philosophies and usage. Linux simply implementing similar ideas to other OSes isn't enough to say the other OSes have "won." I'm not convinced that Windows implementing the WSL is enough to say Linux has won either.
All you have are denials. Linux won the best choice OS to use because it is secure, scalable and it's more preferred to used on many types of devices from super computers to small embeded devices. Microsoft is using linux in it's azure iot controller. lol
I agree. Linux won the war because it is the better choice, regardless of what Microsoft does or what "most" "almost all" or "normal" people do about this simple statement of fact.
There will be many noble battles with ignorance and other very important and multifaceted aspects of the world(s) we live in long after anyone who could ever imaginably read these words we type into this fragile internet tonight, but there are always battles long after heroes have shuffled off this mortal coil.
But we won this one. Linux is unquestionably a better OS than Microsoft, Apple, Android, etc. The third sentence is irrelevant even if we might have different opinions about it.
Okay. All done. We can go have fun now.
Since you seem to be advocating in favor of Linux, I can't disagree too much. However, I do just need to point out that Android is built on top of Linux. So I feel it's a little questionable to say Linux is better than Android.
Since you seem to be advocating in favor of Linux, I can't disagree too much. However, I do just need to point out that Android is built on top of Linux. So I feel it's a little questionable to say Linux is better than Android.
Android only uses the Linux kernel. Here, I imagine Linux means the GNU/Linux OS, since it's being treated as comparable to Windows.
Android only uses the Linux kernel. Here, I imagine Linux means the GNU/Linux OS, since it's being treated as comparable to Windows.
In a sense, it could be said that about the only thing that is Linux itself, is the kernel. Beyond that, there are a whoooooooole slew of different "distributions". In that sense, Android could more or less be thought of as a Linux distribution.
In a sense, it could be said that about the only thing that is Linux itself, is the kernel. Beyond that, there are a whoooooooole slew of different "distributions". In that sense, Android could more or less be thought of as a Linux distribution.
But that is not the meaning which "Linux distribution" is commonly understood to hold (that is, an operating system consisting of at minimum the GNU core, the Linux kernel, and a package manager). If I define "fruit" as any body produced by a plant and then say that by that definition, carrots are a fruit, I'd be technically right, but that would mean absolutely nothing because my initial definition was not widely accepted.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.