Because Shiny Things Are Fun - The New New Windows v Linux Thread
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Arch Linux && OpenBSD 7.4 && Pop!_OS && Kali && Qubes-Os
Posts: 824
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe
Windows has grown a package manager now.
if someone would have said ms has a opensource package manager i would have thought he is crazy
wondering what kind of repos they will have, malware could use this package manager to spread.
"Package managers are obviously full of malware if a large company maintains their repositories", happy Red Hat, Canonical or whatever-distribution-you-prefer customers said...
I suggest that you'd better wait for what will happen with the Windows Package Manager. I will!
Don't let anybody fool you. Package managers aren't fool proof. Plus in Apple's case, theirs is designed to create the ultimate walled ecosystem to eliminate competition from third party developers.
Google's crap might be a little better but that's not saying much by any means! One platform all of Google. Including tracking any receipts that come into your gmail inbox. What a great package manager. You no longer need to hunt for the receipt when you want to return a package
Seriously though, if a package manager serves closed sourced apps...I don't care who runs it...Its only as trustworthy as the devs themselves.
I wonder if buying npm inspired the ms package manager.
Actually, Google's "App Store" is continually bombarded with fake apps so not sure theirs is any better. I trust Apple's much more of the 2, although I only have 2 or 3 third party apps on this MacBook and a few more on my iPhone. I could care less about the walled garden but indeed you do have to trust their devs because you have no choice if you live there.
In the windows world, Microsoft has trained users over the past few decades to just go out on the web and grab what you need, which is obviously dangerous. Good they are learning from us in terms of a singular place to get applications.
Why does this thread exist, especially on a Linux board? There is inevitably going to be bias, so it means absolutely nothing, and at the end of the day, you use what works for you.
Why not vim or nano. Why not gnome or kde? I could go on. The whole premise of the thread is completely pointless.
Actually, Google's "App Store" is continually bombarded with fake apps so not sure theirs is any better. I trust Apple's much more of the 2, although I only have 2 or 3 third party apps on this MacBook and a few more on my iPhone. I could care less about the walled garden but indeed you do have to trust their devs because you have no choice if you live there.
In the windows world, Microsoft has trained users over the past few decades to just go out on the web and grab what you need, which is obviously dangerous. Good they are learning from us in terms of a singular place to get applications.
Yup I was waiting on this post From the dev view point Google wins easy. One time $25 fee vs a recurring $100 fee. But seriously, both stink...bad.
From a user view point google has a lot of junk but there's also reputable apps. If somebody is careless, no iOS will solve that.
For the most part apps need to ask permission before doing anything sensitive although underneath them Apple and Google do not.
Also iOS probably wouldn't run on my $15 phone But none the less I want to ditch A*****d asap. I HATE Google!!!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.