LinuxQuestions.org - BASH 2000 (windoze 2000 that is), or how i fell in love with the atomic bomb

- General (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/)

- - BASH 2000 (windoze 2000 that is), or how i fell in love with the atomic bomb (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/bash-2000-windoze-2000-that-is-or-how-i-fell-in-love-with-the-atomic-bomb-301666/)

soylentgreen

03-14-2005 07:51 PM

BASH 2000 (windoze 2000 that is), or how i fell in love with the atomic bomb

k.. so im sitting here at work.. win2k.. in a

Code:

cmd

window.. and i accidentally did

Code:

ls

instead ov

Code:

dir

it worked.. neat.

so i was like.. hrm.. what about

Code:

ls -l

yup..

how about

Code:

ls -l|grep log

roger that

so i got crazy.. did..

Code:

cat super.log|grep xyz

and some

Code:

chmod g+w super.log

and it all worked...

so who let M$ into the BASH barn, and why didn't anyone tell me!?

stupid, i know.. just found it interesting.

scuzzman

03-14-2005 10:48 PM

Code:

Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]

(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.



H:\>ls

'ls' is not recognized as an internal or external command,

operable program or batch file.



H:\>chmod

'chmod' is not recognized as an internal or external command,

operable program or batch file.



H:\>grep

'grep' is not recognized as an internal or external command,

operable program or batch file.



H:\>ls -l

'ls' is not recognized as an internal or external command,

operable program or batch file.



H:\>echo doesnt seem to be working for me

doesnt seem to be working for me



H:\>

frob23

03-14-2005 11:23 PM

It is likely your work requires some software which expects a Unix-type environment. So you probably have cygwin or its equivalent installed.

None of those things would work on a stock Win2k install (as pointed out before this post).

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.