A New Society, open society, without politics: Auroville. An Utopia?
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The only human society without politics is an absolute dictatorship. The only way humans get along without politics is by total isolation from each other, or total subservience. Neither appeals to me as a "utopia".
The only human society without politics is an absolute dictatorship. The only way humans get along without politics is by total isolation from each other, or total subservience. Neither appeals to me as a "utopia".
"absolute dictatorship" : It seems that in this Utopia, living City there is no dictatorship.
It seems to work without it.
"absolute dictatorship" : It seems that in this Utopia, living City there is no dictatorship.
It seems to work without it.
And how do people resolve their differences?
If they kill each other, that is not "utopia" in my book! If they negotiate, that is politics. How do they decide things for the good of the group? If they discuss it and come to a decision, that is politics.
Utopias require the presence of a "benevolent dictator" who is loved by everyone and therefore accepted by everyone as (s)he tells everyone what to do and they willingly do it. Such a thing does not exist in real life.
Utopias require the presence of a "benevolent dictator" who is loved by everyone and therefore accepted by everyone as (s)he tells everyone what to do and they willingly do it. Such a thing does not exist in real life.
I find this hilarious. You guys are slowly making progress at working out the conditions necessary for a Utopia and necessary Qualities in a Benevolent Dictator. One religion in particular has been offering you just that, repeatedly trying to tell you, and you don't want to know. Do you all secretly want to be the BDFL?
Get rid of private ownership of excessive toys which means one must dump capitalism and everyone under the sun is equal and does not covet what others have. Because technology can be organized to full fill all needs. Hospital care. Everything. Equal under the sun.
Never happen. Capitalism. Which walks hand in with politics and wars. Has been embedded into the social conscience so long it like breathing. So dream on.
This has to be planet wide change. One country that has it that good will likely be invaded. As human nature has shown.
Get rid of private ownership of excessive toys which means one must dump capitalism and everyone under the sun is equal and does not covet what others have.
I think you've got that backwards. It's the negative traits in human nature that feed materialism, not the other way around.
The idea in Exodus 20:17 is "you shall not covet." If we do, it's entirely a failure on our part.
Envy and hedonism occur as a result of weaknesses in human nature, not as a consequence of inequality or capitalism. Abolishing private property would not address the underlying cause of envy, and if history tells us anything, it won't even paper over the issue.
For instance, do you envy Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, or Elon Musk their wealth? I certainly don't, because I have a roof over my head and enough food to eat every day. The fact that others have in excess does not rob me of what I have. It's not a zero-sum game.
Now, I also have access to technology and luxury items that dwarfs the standards of even kings and emperors of old; that's probably true of just about everyone reading this. And yet, according to the current societal standards, I'm supposedly really poor.
I regularly see people much wealthier than myself claiming they're being economically oppressed, and saying they're entitled to some sort of compensation or handout just for existing. That's some real "coveting" right there, and it's the result of humans embracing the worst parts of their nature.
"Capitalism" (which is just a politically left-wing term for Free Markets) has next to nothing to do with it, although one could argue that excessive focus on material wealth doesn't exactly cultivate virtues like humility and generosity.
As a matter of interest: There is a lot of talk about what the Utopia must be like. There is very little talk about the Qualifications for entry. Let's presume that the BDFL had set stringent & uncompromising qualifications for entry. Would folks be prepared to make serious life adjustments to make sure the Utopia stayed a Utopia, or would you rather pass up on this offer?
As a matter of interest: There is a lot of talk about what the Utopia must be like. There is very little talk about the Qualifications for entry. Let's presume that the BDFL had set stringent & uncompromising qualifications for entry. Would folks be prepared to make serious life adjustments to make sure the Utopia stayed a Utopia, or would you rather pass up on this offer?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.