LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2019, 03:50 AM   #1
RandomTroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,259

Rep: Reputation: 204Reputation: 204Reputation: 204
'In Stores, Secret Bluetooth Surveillance Tracks Your Every Move '


Quote:
'To protect yourself from beacons in the short term, you can delete any apps that may be spying on you - including apps from retailers - and shut off location services and Bluetooth where they are not needed. You can also follow The Times's guide on how to stop apps from tracking your location. For Android users, the F-Droid app store hosts free and open- source apps that do not spy on users with hidden trackers.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...g-privacy.html
 
Old 06-16-2019, 04:32 AM   #2
greencedar
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Missouri / Taiwan
Distribution: Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic Beaver & Linux Mint 19.1 Tessa
Posts: 461
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 28
Thumbs up

I also read this in the article:

Quote:
And last year, investigators at Quartz found that Google Android can track you using Bluetooth beacons even when you turn Bluetooth off in your phone.

For years, Apple and Google have allowed companies to bury surveillance features inside the apps offered in their app stores. And both companies conduct their own beacon surveillance through iOS and Android.
I would encourage everyone to read this article carefully.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 04:35 AM   #3
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 18,001

Rep: Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873
I'm astounded any informed user is unaware of issues like this. Uninformed users are likely to gloss over it unfortunately.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 10:53 AM   #4
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys for decades while testing others to keep up
Posts: 2,318

Rep: Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333
I am somewhat curious about how this can be controlled by such things as installing Linux as a parallel to Android. Aren't firewalls possible to examine and limit uploads? ... or is this locked in proprietary firmware?

Last edited by enorbet; 06-16-2019 at 03:22 PM.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 12:02 PM   #5
ugjka
Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Latvia
Distribution: Arch, Centos
Posts: 357
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 250Reputation: 250Reputation: 250
This is class action lawsuit waiting to happen. Just need to break the camel's back
 
Old 06-16-2019, 05:43 PM   #6
fido_dogstoyevsky
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 324
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 381Reputation: 381Reputation: 381Reputation: 381
I've just read the article - it's desperately needed information, but it's not really news.

Edit: added "I've"

Last edited by fido_dogstoyevsky; 06-16-2019 at 11:33 PM.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 08:33 PM   #7
Contrapak
Member
 
Registered: May 2019
Location: /home/
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky View Post
but it's not really news.
I disagree. There might be some people aware this is happening, but there are certainly a large portion of the population who are oblivious. This is newsworthy.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 08:46 PM   #8
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 15,214
Blog Entries: 25

Rep: Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335Reputation: 4335
Quote:
I'm astounded any informed user is unaware of issues like this.
I'm not.

There are various levels of being "informed." Persons may be "informed" (for example, when they get a message from Google asking how they liked their visit to "Joe's Diner"), but say to themselves, well, I trust Google and it's okay (they shouldn't and it isn't)--and not realize that Google is using that information to profile them, then using the profile to further undermine their privacy.

Then there are the "I got nothing to hide so it's okay" folks (I know one) who naively think that they have or always will have nothing to hide. They have no concept that "private" does not mean nefarious--it means only nobody else's business.
 
Old 06-16-2019, 10:25 PM   #9
fido_dogstoyevsky
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 324
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 381Reputation: 381Reputation: 381Reputation: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contrapak View Post
I disagree. There might be some people aware this is happening, but there are certainly a large portion of the population who are oblivious. This is newsworthy.
I agree that a great many people are wilfully oblivious, but they're unlikely to believe the article.

This misuse of bluetooth is just another step along the road built when unauthorised (by the device owner) collecting or sharing of information wasn't made a gaolable (or jailable, if you prefer) offence. As news, it's old.
 
Old 06-17-2019, 12:40 AM   #10
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 11,967
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198Reputation: 3198
Quote:
Originally Posted by enorbet View Post
... or is this locked in proprietary firmware?
this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ugjka View Post
This is class action lawsuit waiting to happen. Just need to break the camel's back
One can always hope...

Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky View Post
I agree that a great many people are wilfully oblivious
I agree too. Nice phrase btw, "wilfully oblivious".
 
Old 06-17-2019, 04:13 AM   #11
Pastychomper
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Android
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 160Reputation: 160
I have an Android 'phone that's fairly open about its ability to magically detect nearby BT and Wifi devices when the respective functions are "turned off," so the idea of Google (or Samsung) using them for tracking is no surprise to me.

The article solved a mystery for me though. My 'phone has an optional "high accuracy" location setting that claims to use BT and Wifi to improve on the various GNSS signals it uses. It makes no obvious difference to any of the mapping apps I use, but the stock camera app won't add location information to pictures without it. Now I can see both how it's supposed to work (in the locations where I'm least likely to use it ) and why Someone™ is so keen for me to use it.

The position of the "balance" is interesting. It seems that anyone sufficiently interested can find out what tracking is being done, and can even turn it off because Google et al put little switches in obscure locations with misleading labels so they can claim consent. The situation could be far better, but could also be far worse.
 
Old 06-17-2019, 04:29 AM   #12
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 18,001

Rep: Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873Reputation: 2873
The later versions of Android (and of course lineage) give you more control over what functionality apps have authority to use. I give everything the "ok" on install, then go back and turn it all off. Some things get snaky (google itself and gopro e.g.) but I allow them when I want to use them, then disable it again. Fsck 'em.
 
Old 06-17-2019, 06:13 AM   #13
Lysander666
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: The Underearth
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,750
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791Reputation: 1791
Use a dumbphone, going on four years here.
 
Old 06-17-2019, 08:24 AM   #14
m.a.l.'s pa
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: albuquerque
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 295

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lysander666 View Post
Use a dumbphone, going on four years here.
Trying to decide if I want to do this, and wondering how much I'd miss the smartphone.
 
Old 06-17-2019, 01:40 PM   #15
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys for decades while testing others to keep up
Posts: 2,318

Rep: Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333Reputation: 2333
I, too, have been using a dumb phone for around 4 years now but since it is "a burner" the provider is forcing an upgrade claiming my current phone will soon be unusable with the "upgraded" network. This is why I'm asking if an Android phone which has a parallel installation of a complete Linux OpSys might be useful in controlling Android, or at the very least what can get in and what goes out since i will have root. Even if such spyware possibilities are in firmware there is at least the possibility of bit-flipping to alter even that. Maybe I am hoping for too much but I have substantially replaced and altered a considerable number of firmware devices in the past IF they were designed to accept any updating at all, and a handful that were not. The latter, of course, required physical chip replacement but that may well be nearly impossible within the wave-soldered extreme miniaturization in smartphones.

Last edited by enorbet; 06-17-2019 at 01:46 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] bluetooth dongle + bluetooth speaker but no sound on the bluetooth speaker vonbiber Slackware 4 05-11-2017 09:53 AM
LXer: Will Microsoft’s Police Surveillance System Violate Your Privacy? LXer Syndicated Linux News 2 08-12-2012 11:48 AM
LXer: Carrier IQ: How the rootkit tracks everything on your phone and how to remove it LXer Syndicated Linux News 3 12-05-2011 01:49 AM
LXer: Dell's "secret Linux fling" not so secret LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-11-2007 09:33 AM
Software That Knows Your Every Move masand Linux - News 1 09-28-2004 06:23 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration