Fedora - Installation This forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Fedora. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
01-27-2011, 09:30 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Rep:
|
Cannot install Rawhide from Live USB: "Not a live image"
Trying to install Rawhide from a Live USB created with UNetBootin returns an error: "Not a Live Image". I'm still wondering why this is, when Ubuntu installs fine from a Live USB.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 09:53 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thank you, TobiSGD. When I get a working OS installed again (and get home from school) I will be sure to try this out.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 10:01 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
What has happened to your Debian install?
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 06:03 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
|
Still the same problem:

|
|
|
01-27-2011, 06:25 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Do I get it right, the installer is started in a running live environment, but is complaining that it has no live environment to install?
Have you compared the md5sums?
Rawhide is a development version, so may be there is a bug in the installer. If the md5sums are correct, I would wait until the next nightly build is released and try that.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 07:02 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
These are two different nightly builds. One is 20110125 and the other is 20110126. Both of them have the same problem. It definitely has to be a bug in the installer.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 08:09 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, I checked the latest build and neither the md5sum or sha1sum match the sum used on the server. So I guess it is a corrupted build, and they need to consider fixing this bug.
I will see if I can report a bug about it.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 08:20 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
May be I am confused here, but if the md5sum doesn't match, doesn't that mean that your download is corrupted.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 08:29 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 08:36 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
May be I am confused here, but if the md5sum doesn't match, doesn't that mean that your download is corrupted.
|
Well what are the odds of *two* of them being corrupted?
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 08:39 PM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Don't know. Coincidence? Anyways, we will see what they say about your bug report.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 09:41 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, apparently it takes Red Hat Bugzilla admins longer to respond than GNOME Bugzilla admins. We'll just have to wait and see. In the mean time, I am downloading a newer ISO to check the md5sum and sha1sum on.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 09:47 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Code:
kenny_strawn@kenny-AOA110:~/Downloads$ checkisomd5 $(ls)
The media check is complete, the result is: PASS.
It is OK to use this media.
kenny_strawn@kenny-AOA110:~/Downloads$
Apparently it isn't corrrupted, so it has to be a bug with the installer. I will try to burn the ISO to a CD and see what happens.
|
|
|
01-27-2011, 10:02 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Original Poster
Rep:
|
However, the problem still occurs, even from the Live CD... I'm seriously thinking it's now the installer that's definitely the problem.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|