My two cents:
Quoting from the
Fedora project page:
Quote:
It (fedora) is also a proving ground for new technology that may eventually make its way into Red Hat products.
|
This means that Fedora core is a testing bed that should not be confused with an enterprise 'stable' environment.
This is both and advantage and disadvantage depending on your point of view:
An advantage because in exchange of shorter release cycles, we, the users, have agreed to be the testers for that 'new technology'.
A disadvantage because it should not be used as a 'production' platform.
Well, now to your question. There isn't a hard technical guideline about updating your kernel.
If it is stable for you for everything you use, why update?.
Why update? well, New kernels may include security fixes plus you may need them eventually to run a newer version of something AND you would be keeping your side of the bargain: be te testing ground.
Hey! that does not mean that FC is not stable, just that you should not consider it to be stable.
Regarding the question about up2date/yum:
You will find that not that many people consider up2date very stable or fast.
90% of the time I use yum to update. I have had the same issue as you describe and then I just do as you did, run up2date.
My advice: Run yum first and if for whatever reason it does not update something, run up2date.
If you have added additional repositories to yum please note that those won't be picked up by the RedHat network icon. So you'll have to run yum update every now an then even if the icon is not blinking.