FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Eh, possibly my ???dows-paranoia playing up. I checked the connections with netstat, did'nt see anything weird, did a ping to google (sorry google...) and got accepable return times (below 50 mS - that's fair I guess) and
Quote:
PS -A
did'nt reveal anything extra, as did
Quote:
who -all
- just the lack of updates in combo with an over active CPU (as if there's an "implant" @ work behind the scenes) got me spinning the paranoia yarn...
I'm sure Fedora has some kind of web page where they list all the updates they release. Maybe compare the last few package versions on that page with the ones you actually have installed?
Well, if i ONLY take software in from well-known (trusted) repo's, there's nothing wrong, and hey, it's Linux, after all, maybe a rootkit, a worm...but that's "iffy" at best.
Well, if i ONLY take software in from well-known (trusted) repo's, there's nothing wrong, and hey, it's Linux, after all, maybe a rootkit, a worm...but that's "iffy" at best.
Thing is, sticking to trusted repositories addresses a completely separate issue. Here your concern is whether or not you are getting the updates you are supposed to be getting, which is not related to the condition of the software which you are getting. You already took a step in the right direction by voicing your concerns here, and I really do hope you see this through and verify that you're okay instead of assuming. I did a quick Google and found this page. It seems to show what you're supposed to have been getting. Seems like several updates have been released so far this month, with the latest (at the time of this post) being one for Perl three days ago. With the information on this page, package version verification should be a walk in the park.
Ok, so, let me trace-back my steps. There was an "invitation" to pre-upgrade to F11, after I entered my root pass, I saw that it was the pre-upgrade as proposed on the site, so that seemed ok...
There are quite some packages "pending" - so I assume that I"ll get these soon. It's been more than a week, so I got a bit worried that my updater was broken...
"Good news, everybody"
(quote from Futurama - the professor)
The system just got a whole slew of goodies to update, so that's good news, then. My "fear" was that an "intruder" could prevent updates to the system to prevent itself from being "flushed/updated" out...
No problems, then.
Tnx 4 the tips - again, I've learned something. U2, win32sux, the update page is set into my favzz to be consulted every so once in a while!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.