Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
07-29-2005, 12:15 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: utah
Distribution: Redhat; Fedora 2, 6
Posts: 114
Rep:
|
New GRUB worry after Update
When I updated/upgraded my Fedora Core 2 system I updated the kernel along with most other possible files. Now when GRUB comes up, I have a 3rd option to select and it appears to be the new update.
Does this mean I have 2 installed now? Ack! If so, how do i get rid of the old one or fix GRUB to show the proper one?
Last edited by matrim; 07-29-2005 at 12:18 PM.
|
|
|
07-29-2005, 01:33 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
You need to uninstall your old kernels and their entries will be removed from grub. Do as root
Code:
#rpm -qa | grep -i kernel
a list of installed kernels will be listed, so just remove the ones you don't need by doing
Code:
#rpm -e kernel-version
|
|
|
07-29-2005, 03:12 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: utah
Distribution: Redhat; Fedora 2, 6
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the help.
This is what the first command without the # sign did:
kernel-2.6.5-1.358
kernel-source-2.6.5-1.358
kernel-2.6.10-1.771_FC2
kernel-utils-2.4-9.1.131_FC2
I'm confused if i remove the 2.6.5 and source will the 2.6.10 work without kernel-source? Which should i get rid of , if any?
|
|
|
07-30-2005, 01:30 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: utah
Distribution: Redhat; Fedora 2, 6
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Can anyone help me figure this out? I'm kinda sitting on this thing, and want to make sure i do it right.
|
|
|
07-30-2005, 04:12 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by matrim
Can anyone help me figure this out? I'm kinda sitting on this thing, and want to make sure i do it right.
|
You are not supposed to bump your threads unless you have not got a reply in 24 hours because this sites members live in various time zones so may not have seen your question.
You do not need the kernel source for the kernel to work on your system. The kernel source you have installed is not for the new kernel, so you have to uninstsll it and make sure you install the source for the 2.6.10-1.771_FC2 kernel.
As for the "#", you are not supposed to type it into your commands, its there to indicate that the command is run as root. If there is a "$" sign, it means the commands are run as a normal user.
|
|
|
07-30-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: utah
Distribution: Redhat; Fedora 2, 6
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ahhh,
Sorry for the impatience on my part, a bit of frustration with having to dump my Redhat 8.0 for Fedora to run some more up to date programs. Thanks for the help and info on posts.
Can you point me in the right direction to download the source? Not sure why I need it then if the kernel will run fine.
Again thanks for the help, ill be more patient
|
|
|
07-30-2005, 12:35 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
I can't remember exactly how the kernel-source was installed in FC2 (you should really have upgraded to FC3 or even better FC4), so do a google search.
|
|
|
07-31-2005, 05:19 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: utah
Distribution: Redhat; Fedora 2, 6
Posts: 114
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Trying to remove the old kernel produced this error:
error: can't create transaction lock
What can I do?
|
|
|
08-01-2005, 03:40 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by matrim
Trying to remove the old kernel produced this error:
error: can't create transaction lock
What can I do?
|
Err, remember you can only uninstall packages as root.
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 02:13 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: ubuntu5.04, ubuntu5.10, suse9.3, mandrake10.1, mandriva2006(beta), FC1-4, redhat9.0, debian sarge
Posts: 519
Rep:
|
as for the extra boot option i have fc4 and asked the same thing after the updates the reply was that it puts it there incase it crashes u have a new start point. i also have to agree with reddazz ive used fc1 and 2 and i installed 4 the other day i have to say i like it better or just learning it more not sure which.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|