maintaining fedora properly by choosing the right repo
FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
maintaining fedora properly by choosing the right repo
hello!
i've used fedora core 1, 2, and now 3. after a while with each previous installation yum stopped functioning and my system was no longer able to be updated from repository package conflicts. i would like to avoid that this time
so i would like ask how to choose what repository to enable.
by default in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo only has fedora.redhat.com available so i can't "yum install mplayer" & other useful accessories. by enabling ayo.freshrpms.net and some others last time i created package incompatabilities that as a relatively new linux user i couldn't figure out how to fix. do some repositories actually work together? some don't?
Fedora Core 3 comes with huge softwares.... I check the list.... Almost applications that I need are already there. Some applications mission from there are mostly related with multimedia..... I don't want to populate the official repository with another third party repository.... I just don't feel clean if I mix them. So I install them ( the applications missing from fedora core cd ) manually.... maybe from the official rpm from the developer, or compiling sources.....
So my fedora core system feels clean............. I remember when the first time I use fedora core 1, I add many third party repository.... I didn't get any problem...... strange, that you have one....
well for the rest of us that need multimedia installs (DVD support, mp3 support etc.. ) that stuff is not included in the FC3 original distro so we have to find it. i've been doing alot of reading over the last week and have found significantly more information than has been available in the past (and i've grown tired of conflicting packages!!)
well hopefully that will help others in making their decisions because i can tell you for a newb it's a real pain in the ass when you can no longer update anything!!
enjoy,
disorderly
The information is out-of-date and only half the truth. What you link as "fedora WIKI" is an old one and closed for some time. The new one, which also covers
Fedora Extras, is located at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Fedora Extras and http://rpm.livna.org (an open project run by community volunteers) do not conflict with Fedora Core and do not replace or upgrade packages from Fedora Core.
A group of 3rd party packagers (Dag Wieers, Matthias Saou, Dries Verachtert, Rudolf Kastl) work together using the name rpmforge and provide packages which may conflict with Fedora Extras and other repositories.
There are additional repositories which are much more aggressive in what they include, and some upgrade and rename packages from Fedora Core at your own risk.
yep that's what the info amounts to:
either use extras/livna OR use FreshRPMS, PlanetCCRMA, Dries and DAG (e.g. other 3rd party rpm's) just dont' mix them!!
You can't mix arbitrary 3rd party repositories freely. Only those where work continues towards fixing overlapping content and getting rid of conflicts.
Further, stay away from 3rd party packages which upgrade or replace packages within Fedora Core. Unless you really know what you're doing.
Distribution: Debian etch/lenny/sid, Fedora 7/Rawhide, CentOS 4/5, FreeBSD 6.2 and Solaris 10/Nevada
Posts: 110
Rep:
I use:
extras
freshrpms
and a little bit of dag and I don't have any problems. I've been using fedora/redhat for what seems like ever and there are ones I wouldn't mix or use.
THis is is 5 different box's ranging from x86 - x86_64 fc3/rawhide.
YMMV, I just don't use livna/atrpms I might pull a package once in awhile from them, but that is about it.
I have always used the FedoraFaq.org site for my yum needs. They have built a yum.conf specific to FC. I only use livna, fedora.us, jpackage so I have never had a problem, but yum does give you the oppurtunity to enable different repos if you need a specific package then you can disable it later.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.