FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I used the Update program and updated to the newest Kernel 2.6.X (I forgot the number at the moment) now when I boot up I see two Fedora 2 OS's. Should I leave it alone or should I delete the old one?
Originally posted by aclarion I used the Update program and updated to the newest Kernel 2.6.X (I forgot the number at the moment) now when I boot up I see two Fedora 2 OS's. Should I leave it alone or should I delete the old one?
Rick
that is completely normal, as your old kernel is still bootable.
if you are not spatially constrained on your HDD partition, i would leave the old kernel in tact. it may come in handy. for instance, i have RH9 on one of my work machines, and i need to run openAFS. i had a bugger of a time getting it to compile, and was not about to do it again when i updated to a newer kernel. sicne i don't need to run AFS all the time, i only boot into the old kernel when i absolutely need to.
any way...long story short {too late!} : linux kernels don't take up much space, so i personally leave the last one behind.
It's always a good idea to keep a couple kernels on a box... If something happens, and the modules or something messes up for one kernel, and you can't boot it, you should still be able to boot the other.
Thanks for the replies. I will keep it. When I ultimately decide to rid myself of Windows completely (still a little hesitant) how can I use the Windows hard drive( I am dual booting with a seperate drive)? Should I just format it with Linux and will I be able to switch between them?
Distribution: RH, FC 1-6, F 7-21, Debian, LinuxPPC, Knoppix, Ubuntu, Yellow Dog
Posts: 176
Rep:
Yes, you can either format it and mount it as an ext2 system (say, as /usr2), or you can leave as is and mount it as a NTFS. Either way, you can save files onto the other hard drive.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.