Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-07-2005, 02:00 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734
Rep:
|
How do I change the 2.6.9-1.667 kernel to 2.6.11 for my FC3 CD#1 ISO?
Just as the thread topic states.....
What would the steps be to change a FC3 CD#1 so that it no longer uses the 2.6.9-1.667 kernel but uses the 2.6.11 kernel that has just been released for all new installs?
|
|
|
03-08-2005, 11:01 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
One way is to get the source of the kernel you want, and do a compile and install. Whether this is wise or not may be another question. I would have a concern about some of the modules called by the previous kernel being of a different revision than the newer kernel uses.
I've compiled other things and installed them, but never the kernel. Some say it's no sweat, but I have the same misgivings as anyone trying something like that for the first time.
Another way (better, in my view) would be to see if you can find the kernel you want on a site that supports APT-GET. Install apt-get, and it will do most of the work for you, including identifying anything else that needs updating. But unless you have a high speed connection, expect significant delays.
I have installed a kernel via APT-GET from CCRMA, and was pleased with the result.
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 12:34 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: SuSE, RedHat, ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 734
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by santiago79830
One way is to get the source of the kernel you want, and do a compile and install. Whether this is wise or not may be another question. I would have a concern about some of the modules called by the previous kernel being of a different revision than the newer kernel uses.
I've compiled other things and installed them, but never the kernel. Some say it's no sweat, but I have the same misgivings as anyone trying something like that for the first time.
Another way (better, in my view) would be to see if you can find the kernel you want on a site that supports APT-GET. Install apt-get, and it will do most of the work for you, including identifying anything else that needs updating. But unless you have a high speed connection, expect significant delays.
I have installed a kernel via APT-GET from CCRMA, and was pleased with the result.
|
And how long will all this take with a 56k modem like the one I use to get to the Internet???
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|