Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.


  Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2004, 06:34 PM   #16
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: here
Distribution: redhat and fedora core
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15

hey ppl. can i say hallo to everyone here i am new on this forum.

anyway yea the and is doing that because of the kernel source not been complete. the distribution has the source files and it has not got a complete set of header files. in this case the header files are not needed.

it is confusing me why redhat have done this like this because with redhat 9 there was advancements with the system as to symbolic link all of the modules and core code together in this distro fedora core 2 they have not added the symbolic links. why i dont know.

anyway it curtainly makes the instalation go much faster never the less. to get um working as above you must chmod the two file but you are better off using the (sh) command as described on the ATI website where you downloaded the file.

there is a very big problem with the module error coding it returns errors that dont exist and because this is a precompiled module without source there is no way of changing the damn thing. so i am recompiling a custom kernel to rerun this rpm driver.

If you want to recompile use the rules described above as they are the best guidelines which Boxsterman wrote. but do not NOT download a fresh kernel source this is on one hand good but it will crash fedora if you up2date it because modules contained in fedora subversions are not contained in the fresh source. go to the fedora download server i presume you have run up2date so go download the version up2date put you too and are running find this version at the bash login screen.

install the RPM package make a symbolic link "ln -s /usr/src/linux-(kernel version) /usr/src/linux-2.6

then change to the symbolic link directory and run all the build process above as boxsterman has described then try install if it still fails the read the redhat forum's. there was an article i read which had all the development for the move to it states it should work fully with this server.

bare in mind though all of the above has been found out through trying to get it to work me self so if you have succeded to install the driver with full functionality can someone tell us exactly how and what ther system is. Thanks hope it helps maybe we can help each other here.

Lots love all


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware 10.2 and fglrx (ATI Drivers) cythrawll Slackware 7 10-18-2005 05:44 PM
ATI drivers: fglrx vs dri. What's the difference?? rose_bud4201 Linux - Hardware 3 09-09-2005 07:18 PM
Explanation please: ATI Drivers - fglrx and agpgart statguy Linux - Hardware 1 03-24-2005 10:53 AM
ATi fglrx drivers in Gentoo + kernel 2.6.10 vharishankar Linux - Distributions 1 03-08-2005 01:26 AM
ATI fglrx drivers being slow ben77 Linux - Hardware 2 10-01-2004 03:08 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration