Fc5

aq_mishu · 12-06-2006, 01:55 PM

Is FC5 stable? does it have mysql 5 and php 5 with fulfilling all dependencies to work on both?? And does it have any bandwidth throttoling for apache? What is the major improvement of it except the kernal?

acid_kewpie · 12-06-2006, 02:11 PM

depends what stable means to you. fedora is a developement distribution. it's sole point of existing is to make mistakes and test stuff so that redhat don't have to do it themselves in a commerical environment. from that perspective fedora is *never* stable.

aq_mishu · 12-10-2006, 11:10 AM

Great... then RH Ent?? right?? RH8 is said stable by a admin in jy country. Is RH9 better than RH8?? or RH8 is best?? Actually i dont have enough money to buy soft. I need solution... it is for a non profitable project... www.banglardamal.org

acid_kewpie · 12-10-2006, 12:05 PM

redhat 8 was awful. it was so bad there was never even an 8.1 release, they just went straight to 9 to escape it.

aq_mishu · 12-11-2006, 01:50 PM

I can go for 9 if 9 is more better than 8

acid_kewpie · 12-11-2006, 02:59 PM

why?? rh9 is obselete, use the newest version sof software, don't start from day one on out of date sofware...

inspiron_Droid · 12-11-2006, 08:09 PM

I hapen to be typeing this responce on a machine which runs fc6 zod just fine and dandy. I have nothing but praise to bestowe upon red had and the fedora core team. I think read hat hasa much better understanding of what the term open sorucce means than Novel who owns Suse. In fact, I would highly recommend redhat Fedora Core to any body who asked me which distibution to use.

acid_kewpie · 12-12-2006, 02:40 AM

there is a time and place for fedora, and the enterprise is not it. blindly recommending a single distribution across the board is dangerous. fedora is a developement distribution. it's *meant* to not work...

decrepit · 12-12-2006, 03:44 AM

If you want stable and free, have a look at centos, that's what it claims to be.
I'm only a home user so can't be of much use to you, but others speak highly of it.

aq_mishu · 12-13-2006, 11:32 AM

I am running servers for Database, web, ftp, dns, etc. So i need stable... but since the project is a loss project, need the soft free. but stable.... so ?? And which FC has mysql 5 and php 5 built in given??

acid_kewpie · 12-13-2006, 01:37 PM

so;... CentOS, *IF* you wish to have something as similar to Fedora as possible without a charge, but there are other alternatives. recommending distributions should not disintegrate into a popularity contest, and i'm recommending CentOS here due to it's extremely close relationship to Fedora. other server OS's are available...

aq_mishu · 12-15-2006, 01:24 PM

Thanks... and if i need to use fedora, then in which version i can get it with mysql 5 and php5??
Is debian good for DNS?? or best?? I found RH's bind9 has a major problem with RNDC. And i tried to solve it but finally someone here told me that it is a bug of it. So Debian is good?? and free from RNDC bug???

acid_kewpie · 12-16-2006, 04:21 AM

you don't *need* to use fedora. if you still decide to though, go the the latest and greatest naturally.

debian can't be "good for DNS" BIND is just a service, it'll run fine on any distro. no knowledge about bind9 on redhat, just recompile it i'd assume.