LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2004, 06:54 AM   #1
zombie_wolf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
fc1 seems sluggish


hi all... ot better explain my question I have to talk about the opposition for a sec.. for years in windows there have been many tweaks that i've done to improve performance. (swap file static size / disabling services / block size change / removing startup apps etc....)

anyway to my question, i've been on fc1 for a couple of months and love it, but it seems quite sluggish compared to xp. what can i do to make things a little better?

if it matters much its on an athlon 1400 w/512 meg ddr....
thanks
ZW
 
Old 05-07-2004, 10:14 AM   #2
explorer
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 34
For starters, you could have increased your swap files size during setup. Another thing is choosing the programs you install carefully and removing anything you don't use. To make it super fast you could also compile your own kernel.
 
Old 05-07-2004, 02:34 PM   #3
zombie_wolf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
yes, but being new to linux at the time, I didn't know what I needed and what I didn't. But I get the impression from your msg that it would make a fair difference.....now to figure out what I need and what I don't I guess.....
 
Old 05-09-2004, 01:40 AM   #4
Scratchit
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: England
Distribution: SUSE 9.1
Posts: 60

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hi Explorer

Quote:
For starters, you could have increased your swap files size during setup. Another thing is choosing the programs you install carefully and removing anything you don't use. To make it super fast you could also compile your own kernel.
I'm also running Fedora Core 1 and like it a lot, however, I find it slow compared with XP. I have 1 Gig of ram on an Athlon 2000+. I let Fedora decide the swap file size.

The bit about choosing the programs that one installs, are you saying that even if the program is installed and not running it slows down the Linux system?? As far as I know with XP even though programs are installed they do not affect XP's speed if they are not running. How can just having programs installed slow down the system, does this mean that the programs that are installed on Linux are loaded into memory when the system start, this can't be right surely
 
Old 05-09-2004, 05:28 AM   #5
rykel
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Singapore
Distribution: Main Distros: Ubuntu & SUSE, OTHERS: MEPIS, FC, Mandriva, Linspire, Xandros, Knoppix
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
hi all,

i think wat explorer means is to remove programs that are running in the BACKGROUND, including services... also, less programs will give linux more hard disk space, IF it really matters... (apparently not, since the linux swap is running on a separate partition)

fyi, i am running a P2 with only 120MB RAM, 6GB hdd, fedora core 1, but it runs almost like a tweaked Win98... and no one would argue that a Win98 (after running IEradicator) is slow, so wats the secret here?

well, i created only 2 partitions during installation...

Swap: 500MB
Root: remaining space on hard disk

(i am not too sure if /boot is necessary, but since 75mb is quite an amt on my 6gb system, i decided to make do without it - if anyone knows tat /boot is absolutely critical, pls let me know!!)

hope this helps!


regards,

rykel
singapore

p/s. i was a lean and mean windows user, coz i alwayz wanted to optimise e speed of the OS on my old hardware... guess i carried over tis mentality to linux!!
 
Old 05-09-2004, 01:00 PM   #6
explorer
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 34
Removing unnessary background services would make a difference. Also, the more bloatware you have piled on the hard drive the slower the hard drive runs and even though all those programs aren't loading into memory on startup, the operating still has to keep track of all of them which is more overhead. I guaranty you windows xp is affected by it more so than linux. A few weeks back I setup 4 new IBM thinkcenter 2.8 ghz P4 machines with XP Pro for several plant engineers. By the time I got Office2000, Oracle, Autocad and all the other engineering applications they use loaded onto the machines, the log on times had definitely increased and all of them, even though still very fast, they were all noticably slower than they were right out of the box.
 
Old 05-11-2004, 02:41 AM   #7
jspaar
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 99

Rep: Reputation: 15
Also, if you're using Gnome, some themes are more responsive than others. "Simple" is supposed to be one of the quicker ones. (Select by RedHat->preferences->theme). I don't know much about KDE.

My box feels less crisp with the newer kernels (the ones without preemptive kernel patch), because I usually have either Folding@home in the background or something being compiled. On kernels without the preemptive patch, the mouse gets jumpier.
 
Old 05-11-2004, 03:29 AM   #8
Scratchit
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: England
Distribution: SUSE 9.1
Posts: 60

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Removing unnessary background services would make a difference.
I'm running Fedora Core 1 with Gnome. What typically would be the essential 'Background' services?

Cheers
 
Old 05-11-2004, 10:40 AM   #9
WhatsHisName
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: /earth/usa/nj (UTC-5)
Distribution: RHEL, AltimaLinux, Rocky
Posts: 1,151

Rep: Reputation: 46
Scratchit: Which services are “essential” depends on what you are doing with your system. For example, if you aren’t trying to host a web page, then you probably don’t want to be running the Apache server (httpd). If you want a firewall, then you probably do want to be running iptables. What is essential for you is probably different from what is essential for me.

Just open the services dialogue, look down the list for “checked” services and read the brief description of the service. If you don’t understand the description, then search this forum, google, etc. and find a description of it. If it looks unneeded, stop the service, uncheck the box, save the configuration and write down on a list what services were discontinued.

If a desirable process unintendedly stops working, then go back and try restarting the discontinued services until you find the needed one. Also, don’t forget to check the box and save the configuration when you find the right one, so that it will start the next time you reboot.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sluggish Mandrake 10 joshy Mandriva 6 08-19-2004 05:06 PM
Sluggish linuxnubx Slackware 18 07-28-2004 03:27 AM
Should Fedora 1 be this sluggish? lrt2003 Fedora 1 05-22-2004 01:00 AM
Sluggish performance w/ RH 7.3 theonlylivinggo Linux - Newbie 0 02-15-2004 08:13 PM
Sluggish Linux Kraggar Linux - Newbie 2 11-15-2001 02:01 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration