FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is the /boot partition still required? I recall that it was required due to linux boot loaders not being able to read past the 1024th cylinder or whatever, but have they overcome that problem?
I just installed Fedora on a system and tried it without the /boot partition on a large drive and it seems fine.
Any details on what the "real" problem was with that, and any info on what changed would be great. I am going to do more Linux installs, and want to avoid it if possible.
it's not needed, but it's still a very good idea really, and you should have one. for example, you shouldn't actually mount your /boot partition as a matter of course. With those files not benig mounted when your system is running a crash of your system can not affect those files at all. they are also not used once you've booted up. it's nice and clean safety to keep it seperate. you can also then keep one /boot partition for multiple distributions.
oh and it was probably the 1024th cylinder issue that lilo used to have, whereby it could not access files more than 8.4gb into the drive. this is long long gone now, abuot 3 years ago i think it was sorted.
This problem had to do with the boot loader, and they resolved that years ago. However, it is a good idea to keep the /boot directory on it's own partition to keep it safe. Though, it's not at all required.
Thanks. I will use a seperate /boot partition for systems I plan on keeping around for a while, but I won't bother for temporary setups, or boxes I test on.
LinuxQuestions.org ..... always such helpful people.
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by acid_kewpie it's not needed, but it's still a very good idea really, and you should have one. for example, you shouldn't actually mount your /boot partition as a matter of course. With those files not benig mounted when your system is running a crash of your system can not affect those files at all. they are also not used once you've booted up. it's nice and clean safety to keep it seperate. you can also then keep one /boot partition for multiple distributions.
THAT was the answer i've been looking for all day! Thanks for clearing it out
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.