FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Install went smoothly, I even tried upgrading a 'stock' RedHat Linux 9 system on a different PC and it worked perfectly without messing anything up, which is very impressive.
It's not a huge change from RedHat Linux 9, it's basically 9 with gnome 2.4, other updated packages, and new configuration tools. Gnome 2.4 is of course excellent (I hate KDE and never install it so someone else can comment on it). The new Displays control panel is very nice, you can see screenshot of it on their site. It also comes with OO.org 1.1, Evolution 1.4, and a recent (though not brand new) Mozilla, which stuff you'd upgrade anyway.
All of my hardware worked out of the box just like in RedHat Linux 9 for what it's worth. A friend commented on the fact that Fedora-specific drivers for Nvidia cards are not available yet (it has a later kernel than RedHat Linux 9). Also he noted that the ntfs compatibility module isn't ready yet.
EDIT ntfs compatibility stuff is now updated for fedora actually
Last edited by gradedcheese; 11-09-2003 at 04:19 PM.
I am a relative newbie to the linux world having tried Solaris 9, Redhat 8 & 9, Lindows{yuck},
Mandrake, Suse 8.2, Knoppix, and Xandros 1.1, I like Fedora very much because it
detected and installed my sound and multifunction printer properly with no intervention from
me what so ever. This is the only distro I've been able to get both of these working at the
same time. (AC '97 sound HP PCS 1210 scanner/printer/fax)
I have a MSI K7T266 Pro2-A Mobo w/athlon 2000+ cpu
768mb pc2100 ram
Radeon 9000 pro 128 video card
40 & 80 gig ide drives
cdrw and cdr
nic card
All hardware worked with no hic-ups post install.
I don't know if this is an anomaly but I can say I am very pleased over all except for the inability to use wine as I need Photoshop for a class and I cant figure out how to play my mp3's (Redhats copyright paranoia)
No, it's not "copyright paranoia", it's "not paying a license fee for a patented, closed technology". The MP3 codec is patented. That means, the owners can charge a fee for the it's use. At the moment, it's not really much of a fee, but that could change. Besides, the spirit of Linux and GNU is free-and-open source.
I installed last week, and love it. It even supports battery / power reporting on my Compaq laptop right off the bat. The only distro ever to do that.
Originally posted by 286 well, i can't get it either. anyway, i wonder if it's possible that some one can post a screenshot of fedora.
I never really understood this myself in why people persist to see screenshots. Most standard distro's are going to be running the same default desktops, so one running Gnome is going to look like Redhat or Mandrake running Gnome.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.