why does installing or upgrading delete unrelated programs?
DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
why does installing or upgrading delete unrelated programs?
Several times, I have tried to install or upgrade something, and had Synaptic say that some number of programs that seem completely unrelated will be removed. The latest time just happened: I found the latest Pidgin (or a recent one, anyway) in the Sid repositories, and tried to download it. (Without this, I'll have to compile it from sources.) Synaptic says that to install Pidgin, several dozen items, including mepis-system and mepis-user, will be removed. ?! In other words, installing Pidgin would destroy my system. Can anyone explain this?
Did you look closer at what mepis-system and mepis-user are? Sometimes it looks like important things will be removed, but they are just metapackages, i.e. a single package name that really installs a group of other packages. If you remove a key component of KDE for example, it will remove the kde metapackage, but doesn't actually remove any other KDE programs.
I'll look again, but unless it's obvious even to my novice's understanding that they are only metapackages, I won't risk it. I already had to reinstall MEPIS once today, after an attempt to upgrade using the sid repository ruined the system by uninstalling important things. Even as fast as MEPIS installs, I can't keep disrupting my operating system--I'm in online graduate courses.
Last edited by newbiesforever; 09-02-2009 at 07:56 PM.
good.
if you wannna know a bit more, here is the web-page: http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php
including a search-mashine for backports-packages.
Lets say its the official unoffial one :-)
i wouldnt mix stable with testing and or unstable, but others do so (that is: i aint got strong feelings on the matter).
(you could check for antix, which is mepis-based (with fluxbox and icewm) but may be upgraded to squeeze or sid if in desperate need one day. say as a dual-boot :-))
greetings
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, fluxbox, IceWM and jwm.
Posts: 631
Rep:
If you are using MEPIS, then use the Mepis community repos for backports and do not download from unstable/sid unless you really know what you are doing.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.