LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2014, 06:03 PM   #16
Emerson
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,661

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
The X version is xfce.

The X version is Xorg-<whatnot>. Xfce is the desktop environment that runs on top of X.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 10:26 PM   #17
widget
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eireannach View Post
I am using Debian Stable (Wheezy) with Xfce although I am a relative newbie.

If you are put off by the many posts on various blogs that say Debian is not for newbies this is not my experience. You can get an ISO image from https://www.debian.org/CD/live/ Study up on apt-get and / or synaptic and you can install whatever software you need from the Debian repos.
I am just tickled pink by your post. When I was a raw noob, different than the well done noob I am now, I installed Lenny as a multi boot with Ubuntu 8.04 and Ubuntu 8.04 (had 2 of that because it was so fun to break but also wanted one to use).

Did that because of hearing that same stuff, mainly on the Ubuntu Forums. Was no problem what so ever.

The problem people generally really run into is that non-free packages are not included in Debian installs by default. This is to ensure the default Debian is FOSS.

The packages are all available in the non-free repo, easily added after install.

Ubuntu fanboys and Canonical want people to think ALL Linux is hard except Ubuntu and, particularly, Debian is tremendously hard.

While I actually prefer the netinstall image to install from, the Debian default install images are fine and the Debian installer is nice, boring and reliable. Neither have the non-free content though.

Starting some versions, not sure how many, back the Debian Live dev crew put out unofficial Debian Live install disks and one with the non-free stuff included.

With Wheezy the Debian Live install image is an official Debian ISO.

Debian Live non-free, is not, due to the FOSS purity that Debian wants to maintain. The same crew that makes the Official image is still offering the non-free, totally unofficial Live image.
http://live.debian.net/cdimage/release/stable+nonfree/

Now the only thing that is still so awfully hard in Debian is the default eye candy. Yes you still have to configure that from a very basic look to suit yourself.

This was not hard in Lenny. It is still not hard in Wheezy.

I think the Debian Xfce version is superior to any I have tried. It presents you with Xfce pretty much untouched from the way the folks at Xfce released it.

This is Xfce 4.8 and I am disappointed that 4.10 has not been added to the wheezy-backports repo, at least as far as I can tell.

Most of the changes are minor although there are some very interesting features added to the panel. I don't use any of them but they are still very nice additions. The change I miss in 4.8 as opposed to 4.10 is simply that Thunar has tabbed browsing in 4.10.

I have installed the Thunar package from Debian testing to most of my Wheezy installs with no problems at all but hesitate to recommend doing this as it is not recommended by Debian to add testing packages to Debian Stable.

Last edited by widget; 05-13-2014 at 10:28 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-14-2014, 01:34 AM   #18
m.a.l.'s pa
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: albuquerque
Distribution: Debian, Arch, Kubuntu
Posts: 366

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by widget View Post
This is Xfce 4.8 and I am disappointed that 4.10 has not been added to the wheezy-backports repo, at least as far as I can tell.
I don't find Xfce 4.10 in wheezy-backports, either, but you might want to check out the posts by "stevepusser" in this thread: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=113468
 
Old 05-14-2014, 08:06 AM   #19
Eireannach
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 5
@widget - thanks for the info about the unofficial live image. For a newbie this makes it as easy to install Debian as downloading any other distro

Great post for anybody starting into Debian
 
Old 05-14-2014, 10:00 PM   #20
widget
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eireannach View Post
@widget - thanks for the info about the unofficial live image. For a newbie this makes it as easy to install Debian as downloading any other distro

Great post for anybody starting into Debian
Yes it does.

It is really not that hard to enable the non-free repo even if your box will only boot to a tty prompt because of the need for non-free firmware as my box (specs in sig) would do up until Wheezy. That is if you know what the /etc/apt/sources.list is for, the path to it, nano text editor exists and is always there in an install and the package name for what you need. Many noobs do not have this knowledge which is not really surprising.

Quite a few of the respins are really pretty good. The problem with all respins, based on any distro, is that they are set up to the people putting them out to fit what they think is what is needed on everyones box. As this can't possibly be true what you get is a lot of bloat.

Any package, not needed for the basic opporation of the OS, can be considered bloat. It is not bloat if I install it on my box. It is not bloat if you install it on your box. It is bloat if you have no use for it.

This is not only true of applications but of things like themes and icon sets, images used for boot loader menu backgrounds, log in screen backgrounds and wallpaper.

The applications are all available in the repos of the base OS. Just about any image you want for any purpose is available on line and many people like to use their own images.

Themes, icon sets, wallpaper are available on the Xfce, Gnome and KDE "Looks" sites.

Debian, like all the base distros provides a tremendous number of themes and icon sets with a default install.

I have added a couple that I like and removed most of the rest, I still have 11 icon sets and 3 of the icons used on my sparse panel (Xfce) are ones I made with Gimp.

I actually left all the themes in and added a couple. 128 themes.

Besides the addition of applications that many users will never use and the inclusion of non-free packages by default all most respins are offering is their choice of wallpaper, icon set and theme, usually ones already included in the default install except for the images for wallpaper.

Most of the folks that recommend one respin or another have found one that they particularly like for some personal reason. This is fine and good. They are welcome to do that and it may actually be a great suggestion for a reader.

If there are Live images available people really should download and burn them to disk or copy to a stick and give them a try.

If really compared to the base OS they will generally be found to simply be preconfigured with little more added. And they will be a bigger image usually if they are appealing to a noob.

Some are absolutely great show cases for the more obscure DEs and can introduce you to things you know nothing about. The Manjaro OpenBox version I think is really great.

Thing is that these DEs are, while very good, not as easy to learn to use as the more widely used ones. You really need to learn some very new things to use them to your advantage.

The more commonly used DEs are commonly used because they are similar enough to what you are familiar with to be easier to learn to use. This leaves you free, if you so desire, to then learn more about the OS under the hood.

Once that has been done you are much more likely to have a great time trying out other things.

Debian leaves Xfce pretty much alone. The default packages added to all Debian installs are ones that have been proven popular with Debian users through the Popularity Contest (pop con). That will, if you opt in (no need to opt out, that is the default) that keeps track of what you, as a user, have installed on your system. I think this is a great thing for a noob to get.

Many will decide that they don't need LibreOffice or Gimp or any number of other things.

You can install with the Debian netinstall image. If you don't tell it, at the end of the install process, to install anything you will end up with an OS that will boot to the tty prompt with just enough of a system to boot that way and to use the command line at the prompt, once logged in, to finish the install with only the packages you want.

This is not an approach to recommend to a first time user but should be more widely known as it is not hard to do once you have a list of what you want and know how to get them.

This is, for people that want to learn some basic things and utilize the flexibility of GNU/Linux, a lot more fun and much more satisfying than to get someone elses custom built respin. This is your version of the OS that you have customized to fit you the best you can figure it out at the time you install it. It, like the offered respins, will not turn out to be exactly right. You can do better the next time because now you know how to do it.

That is the "best Debian based Xfce or Lxde OS" that you can possibly have. Starting with the Debian default Xfce or Lxde install is just the start of a very pleasant and educational relationship with the Debian project.

I mentioned OpenBox earlier. Part of the reason is that if you install Lxde and then at the login page click on the "Session" button on the login box, OpenBox session will be offered. This is because Lxde is built on top of OpenBox.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-14-2014, 10:27 PM   #21
EDDY1
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Oakland,Ca
Distribution: wins7, Debian wheezy
Posts: 6,841

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
Quote:
It is really not that hard to enable the non-free repo even if your box will only boot to a tty prompt because of the need for non-free firmware as my box (specs in sig) would do up until Wheezy. That is if you know what the /etc/apt/sources.list is for, the path to it, nano text editor exists and is always there in an install and the package name for what you need. Many noobs do not have this knowledge which is not really surprising.
Now the non-free repo can be enabled during install, by booting to Advanced Options>>Expert Install, although the packages can't be installed until reboot after completion of installation.
 
Old 05-15-2014, 05:51 AM   #22
Eireannach
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 5
@widget
Thanks for taking the time to write another great post - I have marked both of your recent posts "helpful" .

I agree with all you say - in fact I had been coming around to the view "why would I want to use a Debian based distro when I can get Debian itself so easily ?". A net install will be my next project/install.

I suppose my experience mirrors that of a lot of others. The well known distros are very well publicised in the technical magazines / blogs etc - when Debian is mentioned it tends to be, as I noted above, regarded as not newbie friendly. I suppose it is up to us ( Debian users) to challenge this perception in comments etc and maybe providing links to where the live ISO's can be obtained - your posts above would be great links for this purpose.

Having said all that, learning is a process and the distros/respins at least get people interested ( I arrived at this stage thanks to Xubuntu and then Solydx in particular where there is a very friendly forum). Some will be happy with their selected distro and never feel any inclination to progress past that point - for others the distro will be a stepping stone to get their feet wet before looking under the bonnet to see how things work. When they do look under the bonnet and begin reading about apt-get etc I think they will be motivated to move back toward the source.

Eireannach

Last edited by Eireannach; 05-15-2014 at 05:54 AM. Reason: clarify conclusion
 
Old 05-15-2014, 10:30 AM   #23
EDDY1
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Oakland,Ca
Distribution: wins7, Debian wheezy
Posts: 6,841

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
You will find that debian is quite easy to setup & even if you chose the gnome3 desktop it s less resource hungry than ubuntu. Good Luck.
 
Old 05-15-2014, 11:55 PM   #24
nycace36
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SFBayArea, CA
Distribution: Debian-based, Slackware 10x+
Posts: 185

Rep: Reputation: 22
Thumbs up WattOS R8

what's the best distro based on debian 7.4 and using lxde or xfce

Release 8 of WattOS has just recently come out, and it is based for the most part on Debian 'Wheezy' 7.x
As the Distrowatch.com release announcement quotes it:
Quote:
Ron Ropp has announced the release of wattOS R8, a set of minimalist Debian-based distributions with a choice of LXDE, MATE or Openbox desktop user interfaces: "The wattOS team is pleased to announce the release of the new version of wattOS - release 8 - (also known as R8). After 5 years of being an Ubuntu-based distro, we have made the change to Debian. Specifically Debian 'Wheezy' as the base, with some backports thrown in (for example a newer kernel), and in a couple of small places a little 'Jessie' where warranted. But for the most part, its Debian 'Wheezy' as a base to build from. The additional tweaks include the addition of the expected things to make it easy to use as a live CD or install CD. So a reasonably complete desktop for all editions that includes things like support for multiple wireless chipsets, Flash inclusion, printing support...."
The recent PlanetWatt News and Announcements posting provides further details on WattOS R8's Core apps and versions for LXDE

Quote:
Core system - Linux Kernel 3.13.10-1

File manager - PCManFM 1.1.2

Graphics Editing - Shotwell 0.12.3

Web Browsing (including flash support) - Iceweasel 24.5.0

File transfer - Filezilla 3.5.3

BitTorrent client - Transmission 2.52

PDF viewing - ePDFViewer 0.1.8

Music Player - Audacious 3.2.4

Video/multimedia player - VLC 2.0.3

CD burning utility - XFBurn 0.4.3

Power management utilities like powertop to optimize settings, support for power management features of laptops
Maybe this is another good Debian-based distro option as well
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what is the best distro based on arch and using LXDE DR.PRO Arch 12 10-16-2014 06:16 PM
LXer: SolydX - A Debian based distro with the XFCE desktop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-01-2013 06:40 AM
Custom xfce based debian 6.0 distro need testers cmb271 Linux - Desktop 4 06-22-2012 02:14 PM
LXer: First Raspberry Pi SD Card Image Released - Based on Debian Squeeze, LXDE LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-18-2012 12:30 PM
Sorce based distro (gentoo) Vs Binary based distro(fedora, debian,..) ashwin_cse Linux - Distributions 7 02-08-2010 01:46 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration