LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2014, 03:03 AM   #1
jdkaye
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Westgate-on-Sea, Kent, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing Amd64
Posts: 5,465

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Two new package states: what action needed?


Normally an installed package shows up like this when doing a search (aptitude search ...)
Quote:
i A cups-client
Where i="installed" and A="automatically"
This then shows up in the packages description (aptitude show ...)
Quote:
Package: cups-client
State: installed
However two new package designations have shown up recently: "T" and "W" (at least I've never seen them before).
Quote:
T A cups - Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - PPD/driver support
W A cups-filters - OpenPrinting CUPS Filters - Main Package
Using aptitude show I get these states:
Quote:
Package: cups
State: awaiting trigger processing
Package: cups-filters
State: awaiting trigger processing by other package(s)
Can anyone tell me what, if any, action is called for regarding these packages? Or is this simply informative with no action required?
Thanks,
jdk
 
Old 12-02-2014, 03:25 AM   #2
Hungry ghost
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,222

Rep: Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667
From this link:

Quote:
A package which has pending triggers, or which awaits triggers, is not
considered properly installed. There are two new dpkg status values,
`triggers-pending' and `triggers-awaited', which lie between
`config-failed' and `installed'.
[...]
New command-line interfaces to dpkg tools
-----------------------------------------

See dpkg(1).

Here is a summary of the behaviours:

Command line Trigproc Trigproc Configure
these any triggered
----------------------+---------------+---------------+-----------------
--unpack no usually[1] none
--remove n/a usually[1] none
--install n/a usually[1] these
--configure -a any needed usually[1] any needed
--configure <some> if needed usually[1] must, or trigproc
--triggers-only -a any needed usually[1] none
--triggers-only <some> must usually not[1] none

[1] can be specified explicitly by --triggers or --no-triggers
So, I guess in your case cups is awaiting triggers (i.e. not completely installed) and cups-filters is awaiting triggers from cups. Maybe try something like?:

Code:
dpkg --triggers-only -a
Cheers.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2014, 12:03 PM   #3
jdkaye
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Westgate-on-Sea, Kent, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing Amd64
Posts: 5,465

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks Odiseo,
I tried your suggestion and got this response:
Quote:
$ sudo dpkg --triggers-only -a
[sudo] password for jdkaye:
Processing triggers for cups (1.7.5-7) ...
Updating PPD files for escpr ...
Now aptitude search cups yields this for the two packages with the strange states.
Quote:
i A cups - Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - PPD/driver support
i A cups-filters - OpenPrinting CUPS Filters - Main Package
So your suggestion was spot on.
I don't understand why this had to be done manually for these two packages but at least now I know how to deal with it when it occurs.
Thanks,
jdk
 
Old 12-02-2014, 01:29 PM   #4
Hungry ghost
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,222

Rep: Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdkaye View Post
I don't understand why this had to be done manually for these two packages but at least now I know how to deal with it when it occurs.
Maybe the packages didn't get properly installed for some reason (a bug in the packages or a malfunction that caused dpkg to quit without finishing the installation). Anyway, glad to help.

Cheers.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Open States gathers legislative data from all 50 states LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-21-2013 11:00 AM
Package manager states there are updates but there are none cmccullough Debian 2 01-29-2010 08:21 AM
Help needed on CC package zombiechum Linux - Newbie 1 03-20-2009 06:29 AM
GL/glu.h which package is needed for this? farpoint Linux - Software 4 05-18-2006 04:11 PM
message "Problem during installation: x package needed for (installed) x package frayed2 Linux - Newbie 1 04-24-2005 07:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration