LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Debian (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/)
-   -   Sub-Process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/sub-process-usr-bin-dpkg-returned-an-error-code-1-a-171107/)

Bookspoppa 04-16-2004 07:15 PM

Sub-Process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 
I just installed Debian, and I am upgrading to unstable. When I do the command apt-get upgrade I recieve the an error saying Sub-Process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1).

this is the the screen leading up to the error:

Preparing to replace console-common 0.7.38 (using .../console-common_0.7.40_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/console-common_0.7.40_all.deb (--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9
Loading /etc/console/boottime.kmap.gz
Preparing to replace libkrb53 1.3.2-2 (using .../libkrb53_1.3.3-1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libkrb53
Preparing to replace libpam-runtime 0.76-16 (using .../libpam-runtime_0.76-19_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libpam-runtime ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/console-common_0.7.40_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

I am a newbie, so please be specific in your reply. Thanks a lot for your help in advance.

CBlue 04-16-2004 09:11 PM

After you get that error, try apt-get -f install to force an install of the files that didn't get loaded because of the error. Then try apt-get upgrade again, apt-get -f install back and forth until only the package that has the error is left.

Bookspoppa 04-17-2004 04:02 AM

thanks a lot. that worked.

souljah 04-17-2004 07:22 AM

If you are going to be using debian unstable (sid) it is inherently necessary to read the manpage for dpkg and apt-get. This was just a small taste of what can go wrong with sid :)

CBlue 04-17-2004 10:42 AM

I love Sid though! It's fun! :)

feral-deb 01-31-2008 06:20 AM

I had a similar problem and what i found that worked for me was going into /var/lib/dpkg/info and deleting everything that had that name and you may also have to go into /var/cache/apt/archives and do the same thing. I'm fairly new to linux so if this breaks anything i am sorry. i haven't run into any problems yet that this has caused.

mrcheeks 04-19-2008 10:00 AM

For new users, IMHO it's easier to go on with stable or testing instead of unstable.

spinstartshere 01-25-2009 12:42 PM

Thank you, feral-deb. Your comment helped me with a somewhat chronic problem I was having with a package on Ubuntu.

elaterite 04-18-2009 05:01 PM

feral-deb you're a genius! Thanks!

Trebour 10-03-2009 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feral-deb (Post 3040967)
I had a similar problem and what i found that worked for me was going into /var/lib/dpkg/info and deleting everything that had that name and you may also have to go into /var/cache/apt/archives and do the same thing. I'm fairly new to linux so if this breaks anything i am sorry. i haven't run into any problems yet that this has caused.



Dude you helped me out big time i was tring to install torrentflux-b4rt and got same error after using your clean up help it installed perfectly many thanks :)

riazrahaman 11-11-2009 11:51 PM

Thanks feral-deb, your instructions worked perfectly for me.

evo2 11-12-2009 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feral-deb (Post 3040967)
I had a similar problem and what i found that worked for me was going into /var/lib/dpkg/info and deleting everything that had that name

You deleted the pre and post install scripts. This can very easily mean that the package will not be installed properly, and it won't be removed properly if you choose to uninstall it. It is THE WRONG THING to do.

Using 'apt-get -f install' and/or 'dpkg --configure --pending' are what you should do. If your problems persist, try to read and understand the .postinst script for the problematic package and check for bugs reported against that packge. Failing that, ask for help and/or report a bug.

If you are running sid, you should be prepared to do these sorts of things.
Quote:

and you may also have to go into /var/cache/apt/archives and do the same thing. I'm fairly new to linux so if this breaks anything i am sorry. i haven't run into any problems yet that this has caused.
This is where the .deb files that apt downloads are put, after installation, you can delete them, but you should do it with the command 'apt-get clean'.

Evo2.

euromark 12-26-2009 08:54 AM

i made it worse
 
after having the same problem as stated in the original post i used "feral-deb"s tip to delete those 2 directories
which some time later was rated inappropriate from "evo2" - too late for me...

since then i cannot proceed with "apt-get install" or even the -f force way.
it always halts with the following error code:
Code:

6 not fully removed or installed
...
Setting up libapache2-mod-php5 (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7) ...
dpkg: error processing libapache2-mod-php5 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Setting up php5-cgi (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7) ...
dpkg: error processing php5-cgi (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of php5:
 php5 depends on libapache2-mod-php5 (>= 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7) | php5-cgi (>= 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.7); however:
  Package libapache2-mod-php5 is not configured yet.
  Package php5-cgi is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing php5 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of php5-gd:
 php5-gd depends on phpapi-20060613+lfs; however:
  Package phpapi-20060613+lfs is not installed.
  Package libapache2-mod-php5 which provides phpapi-20060613+lfs is not configured yet.
  Package php5-cgi which provides phpapi-20060613+lfs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing php5-gd (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of php5-mysql:
 php5-mysql depends on phpapi-20060613+lfs; however:
  Package phpapi-20060613+lfs is not installed.
  Package libapache2-mod-php5 which provides phpapi-20060613+lfs is not configured yet.
  Package php5-cgi which provides phpapi-20060613+lfs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing php5-mysql (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of phpmyadmin:
 phpmyadmin depends on libapache2-mod-php5 | libapache-mod-php5 | php5-cgi | php5 | libapache2-mod-php4 | libapache-mod-php4 | php4 | php4-cgi; however:
  Package libapache2-mod-php5 is not configured yet.
  Package libapache-mod-php5 is not installed.
  Package php5-cgi is not configured yet.
  Package php5 is not configured yet.
  Package libapache2-mod-php4 is not installed.
  Package libapache-mod-php4 is not installed.
  Package php4 is not installed.
  Package php4-cgi is not installed.
 phpmyadmin depends on php5-mysql | php5-mysqli | php4-mysql; however:
  Package php5-mysql is not configured yet.
  Package php5-mysqli is not installed.
  Package php4-mysql is not installed.
dpkg: error processing phpmyadmin (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 libapache2-mod-php5
 php5-cgi
 php5
 php5-gd
 php5-mysql
 phpmyadmin
Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

no matter what i try to do

dpkg --configure --pending
does not work either
i am stuck

evo2 12-27-2009 06:28 PM

Hi,

ok, first off '-f' does not mean "force" it is "fix broken". As for deleting files: deleteing files in /var/cache/apt/archives should not be a problem. Deleting things in /var/lib/dpkg/info on the other hand could be, however I'm assuming you did not delete everything, just the scripts for some specific packages.

Anyway it seems that the problematic packages are all non critical apache related. You may simply be able to remove them and reinstall them. If this approach seems ok to you then please try:

Code:

sudo dpkg --remove libapache2-mod-php5 phpapi-20060613+lfs php5-cgi php5-gd php5-mysql phpmyadmin
Try experimenting with the list of packages to remove, until everything looks sane and 'dpkg --audit' returns nothing.

Evo2.

euromark 12-28-2009 10:32 AM

as this server is productive right now (running a little website) i might have to wait for the weekend here
i guess reinstalling those packages will make the website unavailable for a while :)
i was hoping on a fix that would enable me to just update the existing packages. but after screwing up by deleting the complete content of /var/lib/dpkg/info i probably will have to take your advice.

jlinkels 12-29-2009 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by euromark (Post 3806900)
as this server is productive right now (running a little website) i might have to wait for the weekend here
i guess reinstalling those packages will make the website unavailable for a while :)

If there are no further problems it takes only 2 minutes or so. After all you are not running PHP either I think.

However, one firm recommendation. You are running a server. Use Stable for that, not Testing, not Unstable. For desktop systems it is arguable to run a less mature system, after all you want to run recent packages to be compatible with the next audio format or the newest Flash. You don't need that for a server. And now already you are experiencing problems.

I dare to add a package to a production server when I run stable. This is unthinkable in Testing or Unstable. In two months you will suddenly be confronted with a new kernel version or a new libc if you want to install an Apache extension.

Swallow hard, and re-install with Stable now you just start with this server. Usually I am against re-installing, but now you have to. Downgrading is virtually impossible. Once again, install Stable on a production server.

jlinkels

euromark 12-30-2009 08:44 AM

i thought updating with "apt-get install" only fetches the last stable versions?
and that this is very important to do once in a while due to upcoming fixes for security issues discovered or whatever

you say i got this wrong?
thx

jlinkels 12-30-2009 08:57 AM

OK, I made a mistake. I thought you were the original poster. But that thread dates from 2004. The OP was taking about upgrading to Unstable etc., not you. You don't even use Debian, but Ubuntu.

No idea what happens in Ubuntu, sorry.

jlinkels

euromark 12-30-2009 01:02 PM

yeah
you kinda shocked me there :)

anyway - "After all you are not running PHP either I think" - yes, i do run php.
and i might have to reconfigure the whole apache stuff - so this might take more than just a few hours to reinstall
i really dont look forward to it... but if there really is no alternative

evo2 12-30-2009 08:34 PM

If you only "remove" a package instead of "purge" it your config files should be untouched. Anyway I'm sure your have a backup of your configuration: ;-)

Evo2.

euromark 12-31-2009 10:51 AM

interesting
then it shouldn't be too difficult

of course i have :)
but i still need to figure out how to display an offline site with "we are currently running server updates" etc if there is no apache running
any way to use a static html page on the same server? i guess not

especially as search bots might visit the website. and if they get nothing at all they might rate it down or whatever.
so a "503 Service Unavailable" would be probably a good way to signal them to come by later.

i have an A Record to my IP address of the virtual server
and my domain hoster does not provide any fallback here

evo2 12-31-2009 08:58 PM

[QUOTE=euromark;3810083
but i still need to figure out how to display an offline site with "we are currently running server updates" etc if there is no apache running
any way to use a static html page on the same server?[/QUOTE]
Sure, just install a very small http server like thttpd and run it while you are messing around with apache.

Cheers,

Evo2.

milomak 01-09-2010 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evo2 (Post 3753885)
You deleted the pre and post install scripts. This can very easily mean that the package will not be installed properly, and it won't be removed properly if you choose to uninstall it. It is THE WRONG THING to do.

Using 'apt-get -f install' and/or 'dpkg --configure --pending' are what you should do. If your problems persist, try to read and understand the .postinst script for the problematic package and check for bugs reported against that packge. Failing that, ask for help and/or report a bug.

If you are running sid, you should be prepared to do these sorts of things.

This is where the .deb files that apt downloads are put, after installation, you can delete them, but you should do it with the command 'apt-get clean'.

Evo2.

This is useful information to resolve the times when using aptitude to update and post-installation errors creep in.

zenlakin 01-13-2010 08:23 AM

This response is directed to Evo2, in post #20 you had stated that you assumed another member had a backup copy of the config. I have to admit I am new to Linux and I am currently using backtrack 4 pre final and I am definitely curious how you go about making a backup copy of the config. Thanks in advance!!

evo2 01-13-2010 02:59 PM

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by zenlakin (Post 3825105)
I am definitely curious how you go about making a backup copy of the config. Thanks in advance!!

Manual 'cp -r' would be a good starting point, however I use automated backups with the backuppc package.

Cheers,

Evo2.

tadeek 06-11-2010 03:03 PM

Hi,

I've had the same problem with gnokii, removig /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnokii* files didn't help. The solution was to manually adit /var/lib/dpkg/statoverride and remove faulty line, which inn my case looked like this:

root gnokii 4750 /usr/sbin/mgnokiidev

good luck guys

jhetfield20 07-10-2010 06:18 AM

E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 
Ok I had the same problem but it was probably due to unfinished extraction.While the machine was installing things,it froze.But in the end it was the same message.

I fixed it.I checked the archive where downloaded debs are stored for impending installation and it was nowhere.So I downloaded the deb and installed it through GDebi.In the end it just used the newly extracted post script.

Also i have ubuntu but i reckon it can be easily applied to Debian seeing that they are similar.

mpsoft.dk 12-05-2011 09:27 AM

this did the trick for me
 
you can delete everything from: /var/lib/dpkg/info
or find the messed up packaged... ex "uw-imapd"

$rm /var/lib/dpkg/info/uw-imapd*

and then run
$apt-get upgarde

//Martin Dahl-Larsen

petemaxi 02-25-2012 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feral-deb (Post 3040967)
I had a similar problem and what i found that worked for me was going into /var/lib/dpkg/info and deleting everything that had that name and you may also have to go into /var/cache/apt/archives and do the same thing. I'm fairly new to linux so if this breaks anything i am sorry. i haven't run into any problems yet that this has caused.

Thanks Ferel-Deb, worked great. Run 'sudo apt-get install -f' after you've deleted those files, then you should be sorted.

petemaxi

pyraxiate 04-13-2012 07:48 AM

Quote:

I had a similar problem and what i found that worked for me was going into /var/lib/dpkg/info and deleting everything that had that name and you may also have to go into /var/cache/apt/archives and do the same thing. I'm fairly new to linux so if this breaks anything i am sorry. i haven't run into any problems yet that this has caused.
Thanks Feral-Deb! This took care of it for me as well. Sorry for reviving such an old thread. Just trying to give credit where it was due :)

My issue was with gdm.postinstall ( removing from ~/info fixed it ). I use LightDM anyway. Thats what I get for tinkering with KDM / GDM LOL

evo2 04-14-2012 07:48 PM

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by pyraxiate (Post 4651805)
Thanks Feral-Deb! This took care of it for me as well. Sorry for reviving such an old thread. Just trying to give credit where it was due :)

In general, deleting things in /var/lib/dpkg/info/ is the *WRONG* thing to do.

Please see:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...7/#post3753885

Evo2.

techis 07-24-2012 12:31 PM

Trying to install Java on Ubuntu server 12.04
 
I am trying to install java on my server.

When I run the apt-get install openjdk-7-jre I get the same error as below, any ideas?

Code:

apt-get -f install openjdk-7-jre
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
openjdk-7-jre is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Setting up oracle-java7-installer (7u3-0~eugenesan~precise4) ...
Downloading...
--2012-07-24 11:24:17--  http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz
Resolving download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)... 23.3.12.147, 23.3.12.121
Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|23.3.12.147|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz [following]
--2012-07-24 11:24:17--  https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz
Resolving edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)... 184.51.50.174
Connecting to edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)|184.51.50.174|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html [following]
--2012-07-24 11:24:17--  http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html
Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|23.3.12.147|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 5307 (5.2K) [text/html]
Saving to: `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz'

    0K .....                                                100% 1.69M=0.003s

2012-07-24 11:24:17 (1.69 MB/s) - `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz' saved [5307/5307]

Download done.
sha256sum mismatch jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz
Oracle JDK 7 is NOT installed.
dpkg: error processing oracle-java7-installer (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already
                                                              Errors were encountered while processing:
 oracle-java7-installer
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


evo2 07-24-2012 06:28 PM

Hi,

at first glance it seems that the package provided by oracle is buggy. Have you tried the following?
Code:

dpkg --configure --pending
Assuming the above fails the next step would probably be to debug the post install script. This should be at /var/lib/dokg/info/<package>.postinst

Any particular reason you want to install this? When I'm force to use java programs I generally find that openjdk-6-jre works.

Evo2.

techis 07-24-2012 10:53 PM

No I have not. Thanks for the tip. I am following directions and I am trying to install minecraft on my server for my brother.

evo2 07-24-2012 11:26 PM

Hi,

I just downloaded minecraft_server.jar on my Squeeze box and started it up:
Code:

% wget https://s3.amazonaws.com/MinecraftDownload/launcher/minecraft_server.jar
--2012-07-25 13:18:26--  https://s3.amazonaws.com/MinecraftDownload/launcher/minecraft_server.jar
Resolving s3.amazonaws.com... 207.171.185.200
Connecting to s3.amazonaws.com|207.171.185.200|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1408470 (1.3M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `minecraft_server.jar'

100%[=========================================>] 1,408,470    551K/s  in 2.5s   

2012-07-25 13:18:29 (551 KB/s) - `minecraft_server.jar' saved [1408470/1408470]


% java -Xms1G -Xmx1G -jar minecraft_server.jar nogui
182 recipes
27 achievements
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Starting minecraft server version 1.2.5
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Loading properties
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [WARNING] server.properties does not exist
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Generating new properties file
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Starting Minecraft server on *:25565
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [WARNING] Failed to load ban list: java.io.FileNotFoundException: banned-players.txt (No such file or directory)
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [WARNING] Failed to load ip ban list: java.io.FileNotFoundException: banned-ips.txt (No such file or directory)
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [WARNING] Failed to load operators list: java.io.FileNotFoundException: ops.txt (No such file or directory)
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [WARNING] Failed to load white-list: java.io.FileNotFoundException: white-list.txt (No such file or directory)
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Preparing level "world"
2012-07-25 13:20:10 [INFO] Default game type: 0
2012-07-25 13:20:11 [INFO] Preparing start region for level 0
2012-07-25 13:20:12 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 4%
2012-07-25 13:20:13 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 16%
2012-07-25 13:20:14 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 32%
2012-07-25 13:20:15 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 44%
2012-07-25 13:20:16 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 61%
2012-07-25 13:20:17 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 77%
2012-07-25 13:20:18 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 93%
2012-07-25 13:20:18 [INFO] Done (8.007s)! For help, type "help" or "?"

It seems to be working. My java is:
Code:


% readlink -f $(which java)
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java

HTH,

Evo2.

techis 07-25-2012 11:05 AM

The dpkg --configure --pending didnt work. Is there a way that I could remove the openjdk-7-jre and install openjdk-6-jre with out it snagging on this line:

Code:

Oracle JDK 7 is NOT installed.
dpkg: error processing oracle-java7-installer (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already
                                                              Errors were encountered while processing:
 oracle-java7-installer
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


evo2 07-25-2012 05:39 PM

Hi,

have you tried the following?
Code:

dpkg --purge oracle-java7-installer
Evo2.

techis 07-26-2012 09:48 AM

That worked thank you. Not entirely related to these posts but do you know how to log into the minecraft server?

evo2 07-26-2012 08:23 PM

Hi,
Quote:

Originally Posted by techis (Post 4738616)
That worked thank you.

Good to hear.
Quote:

Not entirely related to these posts but do you know how to log into the minecraft server?
Hmmm, not sure what you mean. Perhaps you are talking about how to run the client program?
Anyway best that you start a new thread if you have questions about running minecraft.

Evo2.

Quigi 11-12-2013 01:21 PM

Still ran into this old problem, like this:
Code:

$ xdvi something.dvi
The program 'xdvi' is currently not installed.  You can install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install texlive-binaries

OK, I tried that:
Code:

$ sudo apt-get install texlive-binaries
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree     
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  tex-common
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tex-common texlive-binaries
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 8,164kB of archives.
After this operation, 18.6MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Get:1 http://ubuntu.media.mit.edu/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main tex-common 2.06ubuntu0.1 [727kB]
Get:2 http://ubuntu.media.mit.edu/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main texlive-binaries 2009-5ubuntu0.2 [7,437kB]
Fetched 8,164kB in 5s (1,517kB/s)         
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package tex-common.
(Reading database ... 607705 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tex-common (from .../tex-common_2.06ubuntu0.1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package texlive-binaries.
Unpacking texlive-binaries (from .../texlive-binaries_2009-5ubuntu0.2_i386.deb) ...
Processing triggers for doc-base ...
Processing 2 added doc-base file(s)...
Registering documents with scrollkeeper...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up tex-common (2.06ubuntu0.1) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
No packages found matching texlive-base.
dpkg: error processing tex-common (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of texlive-binaries:
 texlive-binaries depends on tex-common (>= 2.00); however:
  Package tex-common is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing texlive-binaries (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure.
                                                                                                          Errors were encountered while processing:
 tex-common
 texlive-binaries
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

And then I was stuck!
Evo2 wrote,
Quote:

In general, deleting things in /var/lib/dpkg/info/ is the *WRONG* thing to do.
I didn't need to:
Code:

sudo apt-get remove texlive-binaries
sudo apt-get install texlive-binaries

To my surprise and relief, that fixed the apt errors. To get xdvi to work (and generate fonts as needed), I also had to
Code:

sudo apt-get install texlive-base
That seems to be necessary, but not formally a required package.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.