Problems with custom kernel
I am in the process of building a dedicated debian 3.1 box for ham radio AX.25 use only, I'll be running a host of apps just for that on this box, so I decided to build a custom kernel and strip out what I don't need, and compile in support directly for what I do need.
I downloaded the latest 2.4.34.1 sources from kernel.org, unpacked it, did a make menuconfig, selected my options, and then did a make-kpkg kernel-image. All was well with that, I installed the corresponding .deb package and was able to reboot the box no problem with the new kernel. Everything appears to work as intended, but for some reason I can not log in locally, but I can via SSH. After init, I get a message complaining about ID's 1-6 starting too fast or something to that effect(I'm at work atm, so the exact error escapes me) and I think it is talking about these entries in /etc/inittab/: Code:
# /sbin/getty invocations for the runlevels. Any ideas? I can post my new config if needed. Hopefully this is the only problem I have, everything else appears to be working (that I have tested so far anyhow) |
It looks as if you may have missed something in the tty support for the kernel. I have seen this before, but I don't remember what it was that I did to fix it.
By the way, is there some reason that you are using a 2.4 kernel and not a 2.6 kernel? |
Quote:
I'll have to look in my config, I thought tty support was in there, but I'll doublecheck and make sure that's the case...... |
Quote:
|
QRZ OM!
If I were you, I'd restart the process by installing Debian Etch. Choose the netinstall or businesscard from one of the daily built images on this page, and reinstall: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ |
Quote:
Back OT, I looked at my config and I don't see anywhere where this could be impacted. I see no reference of tty, but I do see a pty option and that is compiled in. |
Quote:
I thought about going to etch, but this box is just going to sit in the corner doing my packet/aprs chores so I didn't think it would be beneficial to upgrade to etch, besides aren't they still considering unstable? I thought sarge was the latest stable release? |
I don't know about identifying myself on message boards, but that's up to you. :) I've always preferred to stay anonymous, except on a ham list. Funny, I guess.
"besides aren't they still considering unstable? I thought sarge was the latest stable release?" Etch is as stable as it's going to get on Intel/AMD platforms. It's the really oddball stuff that's holding up the release. I've been using etch for a couple of months and I've only noticed one problem, but I'm strongly suspicious that the madwifi driver is at the root of it. I haven't been too active lately - been playing with this damned linux. :) Gotta fix that, though. At least I turned on the KWM-2A last nite for a bit before going to bed, so that's a start, I guess. What are you going to use Linux for? I looked at the SSTV stuff a few months ago, but it seemed pretty primitive, and the SSTV/Digital stuff has gotten so pornish that I pretty much gave up on that, anyway. K ;) Added: Oh duh, I just reread and you mentioned packet and APRS. |
Quote:
I run fldigi on my Ubuntu box and I absolutely love it. For SSTV, even though it's a windows app, I have had success running mmsstv under wine or hamscope which I believe does SSTV as well. Did I mention I like fldigi? lol.... |
I think I've just given up on SSTV altogether. I was interested in the technology mostly. I'm not a shutterbug, so I don't have a lot of pics I've taken that I want to share. And really if you watch the SSTV nets, a lot of them are just sending girls in bikinis or less. I really don't want to support that in any way on ham radio.
I've downloaded fldigi. I'll give it a try. Nice meeting you. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM. |