I'm using Debian/Iceweasel for the same reason that I don't use Ubuntu/Firefox and prefer not to have "non-free" in my sources.list. In other words, I fully support free software and the Debian social contract. Anyone who doesn't get this may be using the wrong distro. Personally, I have had no issues whatsoever with IW. :twocents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I use whatever's supported in the repositories. Iceweasel on Debian and Firefox for Ubuntu.
|
Quote:
The Mr. Tech local install plugin has a "make compatible" feature you can use to override plugin compatibility checking if you know what you're doing. It's got a ton of handy power tools that you probobly want http://www.mrtech.com/extensions/local_install/ The other major difference between IW and FF is pango. The debian package actually supports more languages and character sets than firefox does by using the pango gnome component. This can add overhead and slow down font rendering if you are not in gnome. If you don't need it, it can be disabled by putting the following line in /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc: MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 |
There IS a KEY difference!! Please NOTE!!
I have noted similar differences myself, having Iceweasel natively installed on my Debian-BASED(THANK YOU Randicus Draco Albus for that correction.) Kali Linux installation..for many reasons which are nicely laid upon the kalilinux site ..page entitled What's New..Anyway. Originally, I wondered why this could possibly be..I'm used to hearing that Firefox is the best browser and for many reasons listed above, I would be keen to believe so myself..but I had to do my research.. and quickly came to this conclusion in regards to security, which is the purpose of using Kali Linux (being a Debian build -- Pentration Testing Platform) ..so I am personally sticking with it..imma weasel my way into this one.. As this is my first post and I do find nice postings on this site I am sorry for any inconsistencies to "post-regulation" ..hope this is the answer someone was looking for:
Iceweasel is a fork [from Firefox] with the following purpose : backporting of security fixes to declared Debian stable version. no inclusion of trademarked Mozilla artwork (because of #1 above) Beyond that, they will be basically identical. (quoting Roberto C. Sanchez post in debian-devel mailing list) |
1) Thank you for resurrecting a thread that died six years. :rolleyes:
2) You are correct that Iceweasel is Firefox, but . . . 3) Kali is not Debian. It is a Debian derivative. As such, direct comparisons between the two must be made with caution. |
I started using Iceweasel because it had a 64bit version before Firefox did (this was some time ago). The negative side was that Iceweasel's versions tended to lag behind the Firefox ones (at least for Debian Testing). So I installed Firefox alongside of Iceweasel for a while. Basically I use Iceweasel because it gets updated along with all my other packages. I don't need to do anything special. It behaves just like any other package.
jdk |
Right now although I like firefox, I prefer to just use iceweasel just so I don't have to manually update.
|
Quote:
|
Considering that Debian's packages, even in Unstable, lag behind upstream versions, it would definitely be surprising for Debian to have more up-to-date packages than those provided by upstream developers.
|
Iceweasel is compiled/built on Debian. I do not know what Linux distro Firefox is built on, but Iceweasel runs smoother than Firefox does.
|
i removed IW and installed FF.
my online bankings constant nag screen about not using a IE or FF compatible browser forced me to remove IW and install FF. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM. |