LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2006, 04:40 AM   #1
wearetheborg
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Mint 19.1
Posts: 298

Rep: Reputation: 41
How does infrequent Debian releases work ?


Acccording to distrowatch.com, debian often has 2 years in between releases. Does that mean that people are mostly stuck with old packages ?
I'm mainly worried about hardware compatibity - if distro is 2 years old, then how is newer hardware supported ?
 
Old 10-16-2006, 04:44 AM   #2
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
Quite simply you point to the "testing" repositories which are quite frequently updated and fairly stable for desktop needs.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 05:09 AM   #3
Dutch Master
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,686

Rep: Reputation: 124Reputation: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by harishankar
fairly stable for desktop needs.
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you on this one. Debian's Testing branch is just that: experimental software that works 'most of the time'. For a desktop, or any other working enviroment, you want software that works 'all the time', 'cause who wants a broken system when (s)he boots up after an update? Fact is that I had a broken Testing system when I used an install-disk from Sarge's testingdays when Sarge just had become Stable. So I had an incomplete and very broken Etch system. (back then I had a dualboot system, so I rebooted to Win-O$ and d/l'd a new net-install CD for Sarge)

To get Sarge to work with newer hardware, the Backports have been invented: Etch packages, made stable and suitable for Sarge: http://www.backports.org/

Last edited by Dutch Master; 10-16-2006 at 05:11 AM.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 05:25 AM   #4
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
I'm using Testing for 3 years now without any problems. You get minor glitches now and then, but nothing has rendered my system useless or unbootable.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 05:35 AM   #5
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,883
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533
# stable: indeed as stable as it gets, with thoroughly tested packages, but at the price of being somewhat outdated by many's standards. This version, once released, only gets security updates, nothing else. Perfect for servers, where stability matters most.
# testing: this version is made up of software that has not been fully tested, but tested enough to ensure a low risk of breaking things. The stable releases must pass through this stage first. While it gets a lot of updates almost daily, it's stable enough (as many of the Debian users say) to choose it as your desktop distribution. Keep in mind though that testing is a transitional version to the next stable release.
# unstable: this is the "foundation" of the Debian OS, its "stem" if you like. All the software that will eventually make its way to the stable version, is first uploaded here, tested for a while and, if it gets green light, it moves on to testing for...more testing. This version will always be the cutting-edge of Debian software, but you get no guarantees that something won't break in the middle of...whatever you consider most important. Some say it's safe enough to use as a desktop system, others say that it breaks sometimes but it gets fixed quickly and others would strongly advise against using it unless you are a developer/tester that is willing to send feedback to the Debian crew. Believe whomever you want.

It all depends on how much you know if problem happen, if you run a server then you definitely want Stable, if you are running Debian on your Desktop and know enough to fix occasional problems
then either Testing or Unstable/Sid are just fine.

I have ran unstable for over 2 years now with few problems, most of which were simply wanting until a package was unpdated for the fix.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 06:50 AM   #6
wearetheborg
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Mint 19.1
Posts: 298

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 41
How would you guys rate the stable/testing/unstable pools compared to official releases of Suse/Mandriva/Fedora ? In terms of stability.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 07:00 AM   #7
Dutch Master
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,686

Rep: Reputation: 124Reputation: 124
I would rate distro's like the ones you've mentioned between Testing and Unstable. They work, most of the time, with the latest software on modern hardware but there are occasional mishaps (broken dependencies, overlooked coding errors, etc). Stable is just that: a rock-solid platform to work on. As explained by Craigevil, that does have it's disadvantages.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 10:54 AM   #8
eerok
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Distribution: Mint, Debian
Posts: 168

Rep: Reputation: 32
Since hd space is cheap nowadays, it's a simple matter to run both stable and testing, or even throw sid in there as well.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 12:53 PM   #9
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
I've been running sid (Debian Unstable) at home for about 2 years now and have only had 2 minor mishaps when updating that caused breakage. True I don't upgrade often.. Once every 4 months or so maybe.

both times the system broke it was relatively easy to fix by being patient.. Would I run sid on a server that HAD to be stable ? heck no I'd run Sarge (or etch once it becomes stable)

It's all a give and take.. I give up the guarantee of stability for the advantage of newer packages.. has it really been that unstable ? Actually no it hasn't, it's been pretty rock solid..

I imagine if I updated every week I would run into more breakage, but why would I really need to update that often ? To minimize breakage during upgrades of testing or unstable look at apt-listbugs. it will warn you of known issues before performing the upgrade and allow you the choice to cancel and wait for the bugs to be fixed.. or an acceptable risk level. I just found out about this after my last issue, pretty slick !!
 
Old 10-16-2006, 04:10 PM   #10
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
The only time I have had problems with testing was during the conversion to Xorg 7. When it gave me problems, I just upgraded to whatever version was in Sid, and that fixed them. Personally, I recommend testing for any use other than a critical server, or production environment where many setups have to be maintained by a central IS organization.

I do a dist-upgrade in Testing every week.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 10:35 PM   #11
JackieBrown
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Debian-AMD64 Sid
Posts: 481

Rep: Reputation: 31
I do a dist-upgrade every day in unstable and except for the xfree to xorg transition I have had no problems that were critical. Even the minor minors are usually fix by the next day.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Debian Live Initiative releases first code LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-15-2006 05:54 PM
LXer: OpenVZ Project Releases Templates to Create Debian Virtual Private Servers LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-09-2006 04:16 PM
Will Debian work? CHambeRFienD Debian 1 10-11-2005 08:22 PM
Does Debian 3.1 work dhlawrence Debian 4 07-07-2005 03:33 PM
New to Debian, X doesn't work cereal83 Debian 6 03-04-2005 03:18 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration