DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Thank you, that's exactly what I was wondering. So if I were to stick with aptitude /or/ the many derivatives of apt-get - as long as I stuck with either one specifically - then I would not have any problems?
I've only ever used aptitude to find a package that I didn't know the proper name for (and supplying I was limited to the command line).
A mix of apt-get and synaptic never steered me wrong; it always freaked me out how I would leave aptitude with nothing to download or install, and the next time I started it, it would have packages marked for upgrade in the queue.
I looked through the 2-3-4 year old list discussions that you recommended. It's an old argument. Although it became obvious to really knowledgeable people (the developers) early on that Aptitude was far superior to apt-get, regular users often had the typical reaction to "new things." The arguments continue to this very day on Debian specific forums, but the weight of evidence has gradually shifted to Aptitude. The best proof of that is that the apt-get developers themselves are working hard to get apt-get to behave like aptitude. The versions of apt-get in Lenny and Sid mimic aptitude's handling of "recommends" and "dependencies". If you don't like the default handling, it's easy to change.
You mean specific forums like this one? http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=14036
Enlighten me please as I don't use aptitude. How is it with meta-packages today?
Hmm,... pointless.
It handles metapackages the same way it did back then, and the same way newer versions of apt-get are handling them ... that is to say, the right way. When Lenny goes Stable in a few months, there will be another big hue and cry from people who don't understand it, but it won't change anything. At that point Stable Debian users of apt-get will be brought kicking and screaming into the real world. Aptitude will still be superior to apt-get, and apt-get will still be trying to improve on its ability to do things the Aptitude way.
If that's really the future, I feel sorry for the proverbial noob doing apt??? install kde. Why on earth would the devs repeat the mistake in aptitude with apt?
We will not agree on "more commands" = "superior", but OTOH I still do "dselect update"
Fair is fair though. If you insist on telling people to use aptitude, warn them about not installing a single meta-package unless they want to recycle everything removing something.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.