Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-04-2004, 12:13 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
"Dual Boot"
Hi I just bought an Ibm thinkpad p3 and would like to dual boot with windows and linux "Debian".
I would like to know if I istall windows first or linux.
I would also like to know which windows "98se, 2000 or xp pro"would be better to install for a dual boot.
I will be doing this in the weekend.
Thanks In Advance.
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 12:18 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2006.1
Posts: 405
Rep:
|
Always install Windows first. Judgin by the specs, and compatibility with linux, I would recommend win 98SE.
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 12:28 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian sid
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
Regarding which windows os: if you have at least 128 megs of ram, (as the bare minimum for acceptable speed, preferably more), I would go with Win2K. Note that if you choose to use a NTFS formatted file system for Win2K, you can't write files to it from Linux.
I'm currently running it as dual boot with debian on my P3 laptop (with 192 megs of ram) and it's great.
Last edited by nhwk; 03-04-2004 at 12:29 AM.
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 12:42 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Distribution: Debian (Testing)
Posts: 219
Rep:
|
yea, 98se or 2000
(2000 would be great if you youse fat32 or atleast create a seperate partition in fat32, that way you can store important files there and reade/write to it from linux.)
-Zaskar
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 07:05 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: Debian: Knoppix 3.4 HDD install
Posts: 47
Rep:
|
Re: "Dual Boot"
Quote:
Originally posted by earthanew
Hi I just bought an Ibm thinkpad p3 and would like to dual boot with windows and linux "Debian".
I would like to know if I istall windows first or linux.
I would also like to know which windows "98se, 2000 or xp pro"would be better to install for a dual boot.
I will be doing this in the weekend.
Thanks In Advance.
|
I have always installed windows first. However, I've read in other forums that it isn't necessary. You would just have to reinstall lilo.
You can run any or all of those versions of windoze w/ your Linux install. On my desktop, I currently run winME (strictly for older games and language software), WinXP professional SP1 & Knoppix Linux HDD install.
I don't boot from either lilo or grub -- I use the NT loader and have lilo on the partition where Linux resides instead of the MBR.
|
|
|
03-04-2004, 05:25 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 467
Rep:
|
Re: Re: "Dual Boot"
Quote:
Originally posted by psterr
I don't boot from either lilo or grub -- I use the NT loader and have lilo on the partition where Linux resides instead of the MBR.
|
I use the NT loader as well.
As far as the Windows version is concerned, you should pick the the version you like best. They will all work in dual boot mode and you are going to be the one using it anyway. One other thing, during the installation, I always skip the step about making a rescue floppy. There is already a rescue image included in the install disc that you could use.
|
|
|
03-05-2004, 10:13 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kraljevo, Serbia
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 27
Rep:
|
I had a lot of problems with NT based windows in dual boot with linux. i think that 98se is the best solution because 98se don't care for no fat partitions on system, untill 2k/XP can mess up when find something that is not fat or ntfs on HDD
|
|
|
03-06-2004, 02:17 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 1,272
Rep:
|
I have been dual booting WinXP and 2K with Linux for several years and have never had a problem. You can read the NTFS partition from Linux if mounted but you can not write to it (although I think there is now experimental support for it but this could be dangerous). I have never had any problems doing so.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|