DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'd certainly never go near it. At this basic level, you're never going to get a useful paid tool that you won't get for free, indeed this presumably IS a e4defrag gui and nothing else.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defrag...le-system_type
Linux ext2, ext3, and ext4: Much like UFS, these filesystems employ allocation techniques designed to keep fragmentation under control at all times. As a result, defragmentation is not needed in the vast majority of cases. ext2 uses an offline defragmenter called e2defrag, which does not work with its successor ext3. However, other programs, or filesystem-independent ones, may be used to defragment an ext3 filesystem. ext4 is somewhat backward compatible with ext3, and thus has generally the same amount of support from defragmentation programs. In practice there are no stable and well-integrated defragmentation solutions for Linux, and thus no defragmentation is performed.
Anyway, I know a trick to unfragment a non system partition and which is working almost all the time:
- copy the whole content of the fragmented partition to another one (you need enough space)
- copy back data to the previously fragmented partition
Anyway, I know a trick to unfragment a non system partition and which is working almost all the time:
- copy the whole content of the fragmented partition to another one (you need enough space)
- copy back data to the previously fragmented partition
Regards
Why use "tricks" when there are proper ways to achieve this largely pointless objective?
Why use "tricks" when there are proper ways to achieve this largely pointless objective?
From what I know this tool was still buggy (at least until the middle of this year).
After maybe I am wrong and it is not the case anymore.
In such case, it would be a good news for me.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by shefla
Hi,
I would not pay for tool which is maybe useless.
Extract from wikipedia:
Anyway, I know a trick to unfragment a non system partition and which is working almost all the time:
- copy the whole content of the fragmented partition to another one (you need enough space)
- copy back data to the previously fragmented partition
Regards
This is similar to what I would do if I had defragmentation worth worrying about.
Edit;
I didn't look at the link in the OP before posting.
If you run Ubuntu this would be the tool for you. The average Ubuntu user will never understand that there is a difference between a Linux OS and a MS OS. They NEED to defrag to be comfortable.
Let them enjoy themselves.
Copying someplace and back would work. Resizing the partition by any amount (1mB) will achieve the same thing.
You should have no trouble with defragmentation if you make sure your partition is not over 80% full.
The average Ubuntu user will never understand that there is a difference between a Linux OS and a MS OS. They NEED to defrag to be comfortable.
Let them enjoy themselves.
That is a dubious argument. Perhaps a better solution would be for Shuttleworth and his Canonical to focus more energy on educating their users, instead of trying to sell them things? At least, that is the way I see it.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randicus Draco Albus
That is a dubious argument. Perhaps a better solution would be for Shuttleworth and his Canonical to focus more energy on educating their users, instead of trying to sell them things? At least, that is the way I see it.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
The only time I have defraged my Linux installs is when I have done a re-install. I back up my /home, do the install, and then copy back what I need. Walla new install totally clean and defraged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randicus Draco Albus
That is a dubious argument.
Not really when you consider what posts are made about Ubuntu in various forums.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randicus Draco Albus
Perhaps a better solution would be for Shuttleworth and his Canonical to focus more energy on educating their users, instead of trying to sell them things? At least, that is the way I see it.
Totally agree but, and this is just my opinion, Canonical seems to want Ubuntu users to be uneducated and Ubuntu users tend to like being that way. The ones who ask questions often move to other distros and are often told in places like Ubuntu forums "if you don't like it then use another distro."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.