DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
it's a couple of years i'm working with linux and now i'm quite confident to be ready for debian. i've always seen it as the final destination in my linux learning path due to its strong base of freedom and independence. as far i can see a new flame war has started between debian and ubuntu fans, so i'd like to make my own opinion on both distro. how can manage the dual boot between dabian and ubuntu? (i'm worried about the two step installation process of debian).
i can use two separate hd of 40mb and 20mb. what do you suggest: debian on the fisrt and ubuntu on the second, or the other way round? what about the dabian version: sarge or etch?
Distribution: Fedora (workstations), CentOS (servers), Arch, Mint, Ubuntu, and a few more.
Posts: 441
Rep:
You mean 40GB and 20GB, right? Well, for just the installations you don't need such big amounts. So your choise to install which on which would not matter unless you are having other plans which consume disk space.
Sarge is the current stable version. And Etch is the development branch. And has newer packages. So if you want stability, go for Sarge. But if you are bit more adventure-like you can give Etch a try.
I myself use Sarge. Couldn't try Etch. I'll stick to Sarge for sometime because I got a few importants things to do. Right now I want a working (production) environment, which sounds "Sarge". When I'm ready for some testing and would not bother about a few applications breaking, I'll try Etch.
Sarge is using packages older than Breezy. I'm not sure about Etch.
... this is the part where I jump in and tell about my first-hand experience with running Debian/testing (currently etch).
It breaks rarely enough that you can live with it. If you take appropriate countermeasures, you can reduce breakage even further.
A few examples:
Currently, gpdf crashes when opening any pdf document (presumably all the documents I read are made by pdflatex, so I may be overgeneralising). To compensate, I use xpdf instead. Except that in fluxbox, it doesn't do "fit to width" properly, so I start a seperate X w. gnome/metacity for that.
I won't lie: it's a bit annoying. However, if I used pdfs a lot, I'm sure I could find a way (through google, #debian, ...) to fix it.
During my 17 months of using debian (~16 months of testing, IIRC), I've only encountered two episodes of major, consistent breakage:
once, where some gnome file-browsing widget was crashing, thus rendering the save/open of gedit (and most other gnome programs) useless. Workaround: use vlc and/or xmms instead of totem, don't use nautilus, use glimmer (or whatever) instead of gedit. Basically, suck it up for a week and a half until the upgrades arrive.
Other breakage: evolution would consistently crash on startup. I actually found a fix for evolution (involving downgrading a few libraries), but my package manager wasn't cooperating. The alternative solution was to switch MUA (which I had had in mind anyways).
---
I forgot my point.
I guess my point is that testing is by far stable enough to use on a desktop machine (if microsoft products are stable enough, testing passes with flying colours). Yes, it does break from time to time, and sometimes the easiest thing is to just suck it up for the time being. But if you really need a fix, it can be done without extreme effort.
Oh yeah, countermeasures. If you install apt-listbugs and pin all packages which would become worse, bug-wise, by upgrading, you can reduce breakage with a fairly good effort-to-effect ratio. You might want to set up cron jobs to check that the bugs are still open (and, of course, to download all package upgrades overnight ^_^).
I'm just another
Clueless Debian user
But not in the spring
(apologies to Larry Wall)
Rather than using both Debian and Ubuntu, why not go with just Debian. Ubuntu is based off Debian, so if you want totally different kinds of Linux experiences, you should probably get your hands into Slackware as well.
Try out different distros if you have the time and energy. It can be a very rewarding learning experience.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.