APT Sources
Will it really break my system if i am running sarge and use sid sources?some people say it will, some say it won't, i dunno which to believe
|
|
What do you use your system for? If it is just your home desktop and not "mission critical" maybe you could just run sid?
|
It's a desktop, and i found a jigdo of sid and i burned it on a cd and it didn't work right.
|
OK i have sarge as my default release sources, and i told apt to get mozilla from unstable and i noticed it was getting files from sarge as well, and sid, so maybe that is better? i asked in irc and they still say it is bad, i don't know what to believe
|
I think it is better to stick with one tree. Running a mixed system can be a bit much.
|
You don't have to download a different disc if you want to run testing or unstable just change your /etc/apt/sources.list to say testing or unstable. Then "apt-get update" "apt-get dist-upgrade".
|
I think the "Unstable" label gives SID a bad name. I've been running it for two weeks now without a hitch. Well, at least not one related to running SID. But running packages from different branches of a distro? I'd be a little wary about doing that.
|
why is it bad to mix?
|
Quote:
|
well when i want a file from unstable/sid i do like apt-get install foo/unstable
|
Quote:
|
So it'd be alright to mix sources that way?
|
Quote:
Code:
>$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf |
Ah, ty for ur posts!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM. |